1. “Did the Board err by disregarding the plain meaning of the claims in light of the claim language and specification that require the claimed ‘time select switch . ....
1. “Whether the court erred by applying the Contract Disputes Act’s appellate standard of de novo review.”
2. “Whether the court erred by (a) disregarding as irrelevant or giving little weight...
1. “Can the full MSPB authorize removal of an Administrative Law Judge based in part on that Judge’s explicit adherence to written Agency Policy?”
2. “Can the full MSPB deprive Petitioner...
1. Whether “[t]he Claims Court committed clear error by holding that ‘valid informal claims are only those that [have] not misled the [IRS] and [have been] accepted and treated by...
“Whether the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals erred in holding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Lockheed Martin’s appeal from two Air Force modifications that unilaterally definitized contract...
“Whether the Commission legally erred in holding that Panduit and Siemon imported ‘articles that . . . infringe’ under the importation requirement of 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(B) based on its...
1. “Where SAS holds multiple copyright registrations affording it a statutory presumption of validity, and where it is well-settled that a defendant contesting the protectability of copied material must present...
1. “Whether the district court clearly erred and/or abused discretion in determining that each of Gorge’s causes of action were not baseless or frivolous.”
2. “Whether the district court clearly erred...
“Whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) bars Appellants’ challenge to the NHK-Fintiv Rule, where Appellants’ suit does not seek to appeal any institution decision but instead seeks to set the Rule...
1. “Whether the FDCA’s references to patents that claim a ‘method of using [a]’ drug should be interpreted to encompass those claiming ‘conditions of use,’ as FDA has interpreted that...
“Whether, at Alice step one, Bard’s claims directed to vascular access ports containing, inter alia, structures such as a port body, a septum and an outlet stem and either a...
1. “Were the railroad purpose easements obtained by the railroad as ‘voluntary grants’ broad enough to permit railbanking and the construction of a hiking and biking trail under the Trails...
“The question presented is whether the President acted within his authority when he issued Proclamation 9980, extending the tariffs to derivatives of steel and aluminum, after the 90- and 15-day...
1. “Whether the BCNR erred by failing to give ‘liberal consideration’ to Doyon’s application seeking discharge relief related to his service-connected PTSD, including by failing to give liberal consideration when...
1. “Whether the district court committed legal and clear factual errors and otherwise abused its discretion in holding that Apple met its burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence,...
1. “Whether the district court lacks Article III jurisdiction to enforce its Hearing Order investigating Petitioner’s compliance with standing orders when the cases have been dismissed and there is no...
1. “Whether the district court lacks Article III jurisdiction to enforce its Hearing Order investigating Petitioner’s compliance with standing orders when the cases have been dismissed and there is no...
1. “Lobbying Costs. Absent narrow exceptions, Federal contractors are not allowed to charge the Government for lobbying activities. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 31.205-22 (reproduced at Addendum C). Raytheon includes a...
“Petitioner respectfully requests that the Court issue a writ of mandamus reversing the Memorandum Order, and directing the district court to terminate its judicial inquisition of the Petitioner.”
1. “Whether Uniloc, the undisputed owner of the patent-in-suit at the time the complaint was filed, had standing under Article III of the Constitution to sue for infringement of the...
