VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation

 
APPEAL NO.
22-1906
OP. BELOW
DCT
SUBJECT
Patent
AUTHOR
Taranto

Question(s) Presented

  1. Whether “[t]he panel affirmed the literal-infringement judgment for the ’373 patent because it concluded that the jury could have reasonably found that the voltage source for the C6SRAM memory in Intel’s products ‘switches at the time that VCCR voltage drops below the minimum for C6 SRAM’s data retention— RING_RETENTION_VOLTAGE.’”
  2. Whether “[t]he panel also misapprehended Intel’s non-infringement argument with respect to the ‘when’ claim limitations.”

Posts About this Case