Home
Opinions
En Banc
Supreme Court
Other Cases
Administration
All Posts
Opinion Posts
News
SCOTUS Activity
En Banc Activity
Panel Activity
Search
All
Posts
Opinions
En Banc Cases
En Banc Petitions
Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Petitions
Other Cases
Search
|
Sitemap
Contact
Sign Up
Home
Opinions
En Banc
Cases
Petitions
Supreme Court
Cases
Petitions
Other Cases
Administration
En Banc Petitions
Search By
Status
Any
Pending
Moot
Granted
Denied
Withdrawn
Subject
Any
Asbestos
Antitrust
Attorney Client Privilege
Attorney Fees
Bankruptcy
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act
Clean Water Act
Contract
Compensation Clause
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Copyright
Death Benefit
Disqualification
EAJA
Eminent Domain
Employment
Equal Pay Act
Errata
Fair Labor Standards Act
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Financial
Foreign Relations Authorization Act
Gov. Contract
Indian Tucker Act
IRS
Jurisdiction
Lanham Act
Little Tucker Act
Military
MSPB
Nuclear Waste
Order
Patent
Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act
Plant Variety Protection Act
Postal
Procedure
Pro Se
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Rule 36
Rule 50
Sanctions
Standing
Takings
Tax
Tucker Act
Trade
Trademark
Trade Secret
Vaccine
Vaccine Act
Veterans
364 Petitions
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
18-1910
Case
Elbit Systems Land and C4I Ltd v. Hughes Network Systems, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether an expert who relies on an allegedly comparable agreement to calculate reasonable-royalty damages must: 1. perform an apportionment analysis that applies to the facts of the case, rather than merely...
Appeal No.
18-1904
Case
Hafco Foundry and Machine Co. v. GMS Mine Repair and Maintenance, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether granting trial courts broad discretion to do design patent claim construction in Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (Fed. Cir. 2008), is consistent with the Patent...
Appeal No.
18-1831
Case
Polaris Innovations Limited v. Kingston Technology Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Questions Presented by the Government: 1. “Whether the administrative patent judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board are inferior officers of the United States under the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const....
Appeal No.
18-1779
Case
Quake v. Lo
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In failing to consider the predictability of [the underlying technology], and by allowing the Board to characterize routine steps as a ‘mere wish or plan’ without performing the required Ariad...
Appeal No.
18-1768
Case
Polaris Innovations Limited v. Kingston Technology Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Polaris Innovations Limited presents the following questions: 1. “Whether severance of the tenure protections for Administrative Patent Judges (‘APJs’) was not available to the Arthrex panel to remedy the violation of...
Appeal No.
18-1763
Case
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC
Subject
Patent
6 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether courts can find patent claims ineligible without identifying any precise ineligible concept the claims are allegedly directed to.” 2. “Whether, on summary judgment, the Federal Circuit can disregard facts...
Appeal No.
18-1710
Case
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Iancu
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Where a patent challenger does not dispute that the patent is entitled to a particular priority date, does the patentee nonetheless bear the burden to affirmatively prove entitlement to that...
Appeal No.
18-1705
Case
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Semiconductor Components
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) of the America Invents Act (‘AIA’) requires the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (‘Board’) to assess the timeliness of inter partes review (‘IPR’) petitions...
Appeal No.
18-1700
Case
Board of Regents of the University of Texas System v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), dictates venue in state party patent infringement cases.” 2. “Whether state sovereignty includes the right to not litigate in a nonresident...
Appeal No.
18-1697
Case
Bridge and Post, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether, in light of the Federal Circuit’s case law on the computer-related arts, “this Circuit’s application of the two-prong Alice test no longer accomplishes its sole purpose: to determine whether...
Appeal No.
18-1696
Case
Duke University v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether objective evidence of nonobviousness under Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966), is entitled to a presumption of nexus, where unrebutted evidence establishes that the objective...
Appeal No.
18-1691
Case
Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Gilead Sciences Inc.
Subject
Patent
2 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Does the decision conflict with Section 112 and undermine genus claiming?” 2. “Does the decision conflict with the Seventh Amendment?”
Appeal No.
18-1672
Case
Swagway, LLC v. International Trade Commission
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether the Federal Circuit should break with the precedent set by (1) the Supreme Court’s decision in B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc., 135 S. Ct. 1293...
Appeal No.
18-1635
Case
SIPCO, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “[t]he panel erred by reviewing (and remanding) the threshold §42.301(b) institution obviousness determination, rather than reviewing the Board’s merits §103 obviousness determination,” given “Congress’s statutory directive in the AIA,...
Appeal No.
18-1613
Case
Automotive Body Parts Ass’n v. Ford Global Technologies, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether under the doctrine of repair as applied to design patents the article of manufacture being repaired is determined by an embodiment test similar to that used for method...
Appeal No.
18-1607
Case
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Semiconductor Components
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) of the America Invents Act (‘AIA’) requires the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (‘Board’) to assess the timeliness of inter partes review (‘IPR’) petitions...
Appeal No.
18-1602
Case
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Semiconductor Components
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) of the America Invents Act (‘AIA’) requires the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (‘Board’) to assess the timeliness of inter partes review (‘IPR’) petitions...
Appeal No.
18-1590
Case
Ajinomoto Co. v. International Trade Commission
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Question presented by appellants-intervenors CJ CheilJedang Corp.: Whether “[t]he majority’s decision and the Hospira panel’s decision endorse ‘prosecution-remorse’ arguments that eviscerate the bedrock principles and purposes of PHE.” Questions presented by Ajinomoto...
Appeal No.
18-1584
Case
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether inter partes review, as retroactively applied to the ‘541 Patent, is constitutional.” 2. “Whether inter partes review comports with the due process requirements of the Constitution.”
Appeal No.
18-1574
Case
IBM v. Booking Holdings Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether an entity performs a method step by causing third-party hardware or software to perform that method step on a remote device.”
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19