1. “Whether the Board erred in interpreting the claims to not require a receiver configured to exclusively store advertising data and only advertising data in a reserved storage section.” 2. “Whether the Board erred in finding Hite anticipated Claims 1-3, 6, 7, 19, 23, 24, and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 102.” 3. “Whether the Board erred in finding Claim 4 obvious in view of Hite under 35 U.S.C. § 103.” 4. “Whether the Board erred in finding Claim 26 obvious in view of Hite and Baji under 35 U.S.C. § 103.”
