Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

En Banc Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
375 Petitions
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
20-1283
Case
SPEX Technologies, Inc. v. Western Digital Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the panel decision is contrary to at least the following precedents of this Court: Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC, 792 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2015); Default Proof Credit Card...
Appeal No.
20-1271
Case
KEYnetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether the introduction of extra-record evidence and new arguments by the Panel violated KEYnetik’s due process rights and this Court’s and the Supreme Court’s precedents concerning the scope of appellate...
Appeal No.
20-1265
Case
Tormasi v. Western Digital Corp.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether inmates in this country have the capacity to sue for patent infringement.” “Whether prison administrative regulations are capable of superseding dedicated capacity-to-sue legislation (in this case, N.J. Stat. Ann.§ 2A:15-1).” “Whether...
Appeal No.
20-126
Case
In re Adobe Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Fifth [C]ircuit’s standard for granting mandamus petition related to transfer decision based on convenience factors in 1404(a), defined in In re Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 545 F.3d 304,...
Appeal No.
20-1251
Case
Huang v. Mediatek USA, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Court failed to take into account the fact that Mr. Huang’s infringement contention clearly stated WHERE and HOW Nephos Inc. (MediaTeK USA) infringed the claims of the...
Appeal No.
20-1241, 20-1244
Case
VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Did the district court err by applying 35 U.S.C. §112 considerations in finding the asserted claims ineligible under 35 U.S.C. §101?” “Did the district court err by finding the asserted claims...
Appeal No.
20-1237
Case
Seabed Geosolutions (US) Inc. v. Magseis FF LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether this Court may ignore the corroborated expert testimony of both sides’ expert witnesses with respect to the particular meaning of a term of art in a particular field where...
Appeal No.
20-1223, 20-1243
Case
Apple Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether step one of the Alice test for patentable subject matter requires a showing of ‘specificity,’ ‘unexpected results,’ or unconventional claim elements.” “Whether the two steps of the Alice test are...
Appeal No.
20-1195, 20-1430
Case
NetSoc, LLC v. Match Group, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Is the addition of a computer implemented social network, with a novel and unconventional rating system, to a method of organizing human activity per se unpatentable as directed to an...
Appeal No.
20-1189
Case
Infinity Computer Products, Inc. v. Oki Data Americas, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether the full prosecution history, including subsequent prosecution history for the asserted patents in which an explicit definition of the subject term is tendered, accepted and applied, can correct an...
Appeal No.
20-1171
Case
Simio, LLC v. FlexSim Software Products, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether, in the field of computer simulation technology and pursuant to instruction provided by Arctic Cat and Graham, as well as Affinity Labs and Genetics, it is necessary to review...
Appeal No.
20-1155
Case
Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Hulu, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
The government presents the following questions: 1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), in which...
Appeal No.
20-1154
Case
Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), in which all parties have petitioned for...
Appeal No.
20-115
Case
In re Apple Inc.
Subject
Procedure
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. Whether “the panel decision in this appeal conflicts with the Supreme Court’s decision in Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. U.S. District Court, 571 U.S. 49 (2013), and this Court’s...
Appeal No.
20-1144
Case
Intex Recreation Corp. v. Team Worldwide Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “[t]he panel decision warrants en banc rehearing because the panel went outside the grounds as set forth in the IPR petition to reverse the Board’s determination of patentability, which...
Appeal No.
20-1090, 20-1148
Case
John Bean Technologies Corp. v. Morris & Associates, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether an equitable affirmative defense like equitable intervening rights negates infringement and thus excuses a district court from considering willfulness in determining whether the defendant has unclean hands.” “Whether a district...
Appeal No.
20-1074
Case
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, Aventisub LLC
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the panel’s new enablement test for genus claims with functional limitations, which has no basis in § 112’s text, conflicts with Supreme Court decisions, including Minerals Separation, Ltd. v....
Appeal No.
20-1065
Case
Avenue Innovations, Inc. v. E. Mishan & Sons Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether this Court and a district court may ignore the Supreme Court’s instructions for determining if the patent claim as a whole, not particular claim terms, read in light of...
Appeal No.
20-1047
Case
Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. v. TuffStuff Fitness International, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“When construing claim terms, are courts permitted to refer to the intrinsic record to narrow claim scope only when a patentee either makes a clear and unambiguous disavowal or acts...
Appeal No.
20-1041
Case
Wi-LAN Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“May a district court properly disregard an expert’s opinion on summary judgment when there is no dispute that the inadmissible facts or data forming the basis of the expert’s opinion...