Petitions - Fed Circuit Blog

| Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Search By

Status

Subject

391 Petitions

Appeal No.

Case

Subject

Status

Question(s) Presented

XMTT, Inc. v. Intel Corporation

Question(s) Presented

Whether “[t]his Court’s decision summarily affirming the district court’s judgment under Rule 36 without elaboration necessarily relied upon a flawed district court claim construction interpreting claim terms including the words...

Altria Client Services LLC v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company

Question(s) Presented

“Whether the Court’s ‘built-in apportionment’ doctrine is contrary to the Supreme Court’s rule in Garretson v. Clark, 111 U.S. 120 (1884), and should be overruled or at least limited to the...

In re RingCentral, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“Under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), absent venue manipulation, must facts supporting venue exist when suit is brought?”

Vroom, Inc. v. Sidekick Technology, LLC

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a district court’s judgment on the pleadings in favor of the plaintiffs that all of the defendant’s asserted patent claims are invalid is sufficiently final for this Court to...

23-1354, 23-1384, 23-1407

Honeywell International Inc. v. 3G Licensing, S.A.

Question(s) Presented

“Does an appellee’s listing of less than all claims challenged in an IPR on the inside cover of its response brief affirmatively waive alternative grounds for affirmance found by the...

Sanho Corp. v. Kaijet Technology International Ltd.

Question(s) Presented

“Under what circumstances does an inventor’s disclosure of subject matter to others, which is made without any confidentiality expectations, constitute a ‘public[] disclos[ure]’ under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)(1)(B) and (2)(B)?”

23-1318, 23-1441

Island Intellectual Property LLC v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “May the Court disregard FRCP 56 when deciding summary judgment in a patent litigation, in particular Rule 56’s requirement to apply all inferences in favor of the non-moving party?” 2....

UNM Rainforest Innovations v. Zyxel Communications Corp.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the Panel erred in applying its own guidance, as provided in Phillips, in reviewing the PTAB’s claim construction.” 2. “Whether the Panel erred in upholding the PTAB’s claim construction,...

Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether method-of-treatment patents directed to the effect of food on a particular drug are per se obvious because of FDA Guidance acknowledging that food may affect the bioavailability of...

23-1246, 23-1436

Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Is a timely objected to Magistrate Judge’s Report & Recommendation, not yet adopted or approved by a District Court pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §636(b), a final ruling for...

SnapRays v. Lighting Defense Group LLC

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a patentee subjects itself to specific personal jurisdiction anywhere a plaintiff operates—even though the patentee has no contacts with the forum or the plaintiff—just because the patentee’s out-of-forum conduct...

23-1173, 23-1179, 23-1180, 23-1191

Koss Corp. v. Bose Corp.

Question(s) Presented

“Whether issue preclusion applies when a party, after the district court dismissed its claims with leave to replead, amends a complaint to add new claims based on newly pleaded facts,...

Amarin Pharma, Inc v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Can a patentee state a claim that a defendant ‘actively induces infringement’ of a patented method under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) without identifying any alleged statement by the defendant...

Lite-Netics, LLC v. Nu Tsai Capital LLC

Question(s) Presented

“Whether the panel erred, as a factual matter, by expressing in a precedential opinion that Appellee did not argue for preservation of a preliminary injunction in part, if the panel...

CloudofChange, LLC v. NCR Corp.

Question(s) Presented

“Whether the same vicarious liability analysis for direct use infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) must be applied to both method and system claims in view of Limelight Networks, Inc. v....

Audio Evolution Diagnostics, Inc. v. United States

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether this Court’s Section 101 precedent since the Supreme Court’s Alice/Mayo decisions requires clarification due to the economic damage and unpredictability that it has caused to the point that...

Plotagraph, Inc. v. Lightricks, Ltd.

Question(s) Presented

“[W]hether patent prosecution history and claim interpretation have any effect upon how a claim is viewed under step one of the patent eligibility test set forth in Alice Corp. v....

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Sling TV, L.L.C.

Question(s) Presented

“In Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc., 572 U.S. 559 (2014), the Supreme Court held ‘that an appellate court should review all aspects of a district court’s §...

Apple Inc. v. Omni MedSci, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“When the arguments made and evidence presented in an Inter Partes Review Petition rely on the plain and ordinary meaning of claim terms and fail to account for or address...

In re Nimitz Technologies LLC

Question(s) Presented

“[W]hether the district court may require that a litigant provide attorney-client privileged documents to the judge that is investigating the party, where the crime fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9