“Is the application of this Court’s decision in Ormco Corp. v. Align Tech., Inc., 463 F.3d 1299 (Fed. Cir. 2006) to require direct evidence of nexus to objective indicia of nonobviousness be tied to a feature not known in the prior art for claims linked to an “inventive combination of known elements” inconsistent with Graham’s mandate to consider evidence of objective indicia of nonobviousness where present?”
