1. “Whether the CIT erred in concluding that the President lacked authority to issue the challenged tariffs.”
2. “Whether the CIT otherwise abused its discretion in enjoining the enforcement of the tariffs.”
1. “[W]e agree that IEEPA’s grant of presidential authority to ‘regulate’ imports does not authorize the tariffs imposed by the Executive Orders.”
2. “We vacate the CIT’s grant of a permanent injunction universally enjoining the enforcement of the Trafficking and Reciprocal Tariffs and remand for the CIT to reevaluate the propriety of granting injunctive relief and the proper scope of such relief . . . .”
