Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Oath Holdings Inc.

 
APPEAL NO.
22-1762, 23-2029
OP. BELOW
DCT
OPINION
TBD
SUBJECT
Patent
AUTHOR
TBD

Issue(s) Presented

1. “Whether the district court erred by finding the ’993 patent, ’854 patent, and ’356 patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.” 2. “Whether the district court erred in its construction of claim terms, including in ruling claim 98 of the ’854 patent to be indefinite.” 3. “Whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of Oath and partial summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of Google.”

Posts About this Case