“Whether the lower and appellate courts have a ministerial duty to enforce the Law of the Case and Law of the Land.”
“If so, when is this Court going to do its ministerial duty to enforce the Law of the Case and Law of the Land, after failing to do so when it had a hundred chances to do so in Petitioner’s cases?”
“Whether Petitioner has any rights notwithstanding no remedy.”
“Whether this Court can administer justice and protect an elder’s rights in a pattern of no fair process, and name-calling an elder as defense, when the law is the Law of the Case and Law of the Land not reversed to date, and all orders of the courts are void with no quorum and no jurisdiction, and the fact is judges failing in their ministerial duty to defend the Constitution.”
“Whether the lower court ordering the Defendants to not answer the Complaint, and the appellate court having Appellees not answer the Appeal, in a 100 cases, in a pattern with no lawful intent, falls within the purview of RICO.”
“Whether a judge giving up solemn oath for brownie points is conduct inconsistent with the intent of the law.”
