1. “[W]hether the Board may issue a final written decision in inter partes review proceedings, which invalidates duly issued patent claims based on a ground not asserted in the corresponding petition.” 2. “[W]hether the Board did so in the instant case by invalidating claims 2 and 7 based on a different combination of teachings and prior art references than those asserted in the petition, upon recognizing that the petition’s alleged combination failed to disclose all elements of the claims.” 3. “[W]hether this Court has jurisdiction to review and remedy the Board’s unauthorized final decision invalidating those claims based on a ground not asserted in the petition.”
