Customedia Technologies, LLC v. DISH Network Corporation

 
APPEAL NO.
18-2240, 18-2310
OP. BELOW
SUBJECT
Patent
AUTHOR
Per Curiam

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the Board erred in interpreting the claims to not require a storage section that exclusively stores advertising data.” 2. “Whether the Board erred in finding Hite anticipated Claims 1-3, 5-8, and 23.” 3. “Whether the Board erred in finding Claims 1-3, 5-8, and 23 obvious in view of Hite and Picco under 35 U.S.C. § 103.”

Posts About this Case