White v. Office of Personnel Management

 
DOCKET NO.
OP. BELOW
SUBJECT
Pro Se

Question(s) Presented

1. “Was the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit aware of the discrepancy and deliberately chose not [to] disclose that they would be using a different final order in deciding this case.”

2. “Why did the Court of Appeals agree with the agency and not with the Supreme Court ruling that the agency must provide sufficient proof that a person did receive money.”

3. “Why would a[n] agency representative over the phone tell the petitioner that people like you or cases like yours usually don’t win.”

4. “Why was it permitted that the agency mailed one of their responses to the petitioner [seven] days late[—]not delayed in the mail but post-dated their response [seven] days late.”

5. “Why would the agency take all the extra retirement money from a retiree and never disclose how much money it was.”

Posts About this Case

Date
Proceedings and Orders
April 2, 2025
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
April 21, 2025
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 12, 2025, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.