1. “Whether Court of Appeals conclusion, that Rogero had not established by a preponderance of the evidence between his encephalopathy and his DTaP vaccination, is in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 3(a)(1)(A) and The Rehabilitation Act, when the Court published findings from preponderance evidence, every required matter of § 300aa-l 1(c)(1)?
2. “Whether Federal Circuit contravened § 300aa-l 3(a)(1)(B) as interpreted by this Court in Shalalah v. Whitecotton, subsequently violating The Rehabilitation Act, Section 504?”