Rogero v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Pro Se

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether Court of Appeals conclusion, that Rogero had not established by a preponderance of the evidence between his encephalopathy and his DTaP vaccination, is in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 3(a)(1)(A) and The Rehabilitation Act, when the Court published findings from preponderance evidence, every required matter of § 300aa-l 1(c)(1)?

2. “Whether Federal Circuit contravened § 300aa-l 3(a)(1)(B) as interpreted by this Court in Shalalah v. Whitecotton, subsequently violating The Rehabilitation Act, Section 504?”

Posts About this Case

Proceedings and Orders
April 2, 2019
Application (18A989) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 17, 2019.
September 26, 2019
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
October 15, 2019
Petition DENIED.
November 20, 2019
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
December 9, 2019
Rehearing DENIED.