DOCKET NO.
OP. BELOW
SUBJECT
Veterans

Question(s) Presented

1. “Did the fact that a response from the Respondent was not required in the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims cause the court to assume the Petitioner’s ‘Extraordinary Writ’ for relief was filed in retaliation for an adverse decision by the Respondent for Veterans benefits?”

2. “Did erroneous ex parte communication between the Respondent and the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims cause the court to view the ‘Extraordinary Writ’ as ‘. . . the Court construes as a request for a writ of mandamus . . .’?”

3. “Is it appropriate or even legal for the Federal Circuit Court to ignore obvious Civil and Constitutional rights violations by the Respondent simply to shield the lower court from embarrassment?”

Posts About this Case

Date
Proceedings and Orders
October 1, 2020
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
October 19, 2020
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.