Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
511 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-1001
Case
Golden v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-99
Case
Barrett v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In 2012, the Government expropriated the net worth of private companies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, by arrogating for itself the Companies’ earnings in perpetuity. The Federal Circuit held this...
Docket No.
22-98
Case
Cacciapalle v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (‘FHFA’) placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship, and on behalf of each entity entered into a preferred stock purchase agreement...
Docket No.
22-97
Case
Owl Creek Asia I, L.P. v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are ‘for-profit corporations owned by private shareholders’ and ‘dominate the secondary mortgage market.’ Collins v. Yellen, 141 S. Ct. 1761, 1770, 1785 (2021). In 2008,...
Docket No.
22-961
Case
Steeves v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether Congresses’ Mandatory Exceptions, found in Public Law 91-172 at 508(c)(1)(A), 83 Stat 494- 495 & 6033(a)(2)A)(i), 83 Stat 519-520 for ‘churches, their integrated auxiliaries’, from compliance with Congresses’...
Docket No.
22-930
Case
ESET, LLC v. Finjan LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The questions presented are:” 1. “In a case of first impression for this Court, where a patentee expressly defines a claim term, may the Federal Circuit disregard its decades-old precedent that...
Docket No.
22-927
Case
Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The America Invents Act created inter partes review, an adversarial proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in which third parties may challenge the patentability of an existing patent...
Docket No.
22-925
Case
Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The question presented is the same as that in Arthrex Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Arthrocare Corp; and United States of America, No. 22-639 (filed January 8, 2023):” “The Federal...
Docket No.
22-919
Case
Thaler v. Vidal
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“‘The primary meaning of the word “invention” in the Patent Act unquestionably refers to the inventor’s conception.’ Pfaff v. Wells Elecs., Inc., 525 U.S. 55, 60 (1998). Here, it is...
Docket No.
22-873
Case
Ingenio, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies LP
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The questions presented are:” 1. “Whether 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)’s IPR estoppel provision applies only to claims addressed in the final written decision, even if other claims were or could have...
Docket No.
22-845
Case
Thornton v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-822
Case
Avery Dennison Corp. v. ADASA Inc.
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) tags are encoded with lengthy serial numbers that uniquely identify particular items. The patent at issue in this case designates the leading bits in a...
Docket No.
22-819
Case
Wakefield v. Blackboard
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-815
Case
Skaar v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans5 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Congress established the United States Court of Veterans Appeals (Veterans Court) and granted it ‘exclusive jurisdiction to review adverse decisions of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ (Board), a component of...
Docket No.
22-803
Case
Virentem Ventures v. Google LLC
Subject
Rule 36
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Does the Federal Circuit’s use of Rule 36 to affirm without opinion PTAB invalidity determinations that are challenged based on pure questions of law violate a patentee’s due process...
Docket No.
22-794
Case
Califorrniaa v. Vidal
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Petitioner wholly owns United States Patent No. 10,245,075 directed to a ‘nondestructive means of ectopic pregnancy management,’ which teaches a non-homicidal alternative to traditional abortion. He appeals from respondent’s 51-day...
Docket No.
22-786
Case
Faris v. Department of the Air Force
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Are federal employees considered a ‘person’ for the purposes of USERRA and thereby entitled to the Rights and Benefits guaranteed to ‘any person’ by Chapter 43 of Title 38...
Docket No.
22-7817
Case
Williams v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-774
Case
Delgado v. Department of Justice
Subject
MSPB
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal government can breach a contract without justification and subsequently submit allegedly false documentation, evidence, and affidavits to conceal the malfeasance.” 2. “What time frame must be surpassed...
Docket No.
22-7550
Case
Novilla v. Department of Agriculture
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented