Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
642 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
24-134
Case
Lemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The question presented is whether a regulatory takings claim seeking just compensation under Lucas may be defeated by the mere possibility that a permitting authority might have approved a smaller...
Docket No.
24-1281
Case
Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“This Court long has recognized that a patent is the private property of its owner, who has the constitutional right to pursue an injunction to stop infringers of the patent...
Docket No.
24-1280
Case
Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Apple Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“This Court long has recognized that a patent is the private property of its owner, who has the constitutional right to pursue an injunction to stop infringers of the patent...
Docket No.
24-1216
Case
In re Micron Technology, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“When parties enter into the civil-discovery process with an agreed-upon, court-endorsed set of guardrails in a protective order, they reasonably expect those rules to be followed and enforced. That did...
Docket No.
24-1181
Case
McLeay v. Stewart
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“This Court has made clear ‘in both civil and criminal cases, in the first instance and on appeal,’ it relies on the ‘parties to frame the issues for decision and...
Docket No.
24-114
Case
Zebra Technologies Corporation v. Intellectual Tech LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a party has Article III standing to assert a claim for patent infringement against an accused infringer who has the ability to obtain a license from a third...
Docket No.
24-1137
Case
NexStep, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under the ‘doctrine of equivalents,’ a product that does not literally infringe the express terms of a patent claim may nonetheless infringe if there is equivalence between the elements of...
Docket No.
24-1132
Case
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In Graham v. John Deere Co., this Court established four factors for evaluating whether a patent is obvious, and therefore invalid, under 35 U.S.C. § 103. 383 U.S. 1 (1966)....
Docket No.
24-1121
Case
Carlborg v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether petitioner was deprived of the property interest right in his military retirement under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment when the court of appeals, without comment...
Docket No.
24-1088
Case
Servant Health, LLC v. United States
Subject
Gov. Contract
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether an executive agency contracting officer may eliminate the requirement to exercise discretion by inserting contract language that nullifies the Federal Acquisition Regulation’s excusable delay protections in a commercial...
Docket No.
24-1058
Case
CloudofChange, LLC v. NCR Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc., 572 U.S. 915 (2014), the Court observed that ‘[t]he Federal Circuit’s analysis fundamentally misunderstands what it means to infringe a method patent.’...
Docket No.
23-904
Case
Golden v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-892
Case
Brock v. Department of Transportation
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2) is fair in allowing 30-days for judicial review in comparison to 60-day rule within 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) and 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(B).” 2. “Whether...
Docket No.
23-804
Case
Liquidia Technologies, Inc. v. United Therapeutics Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (‘AIA’), a party may challenge the validity of a patent in an inter partes review proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (‘PTAB’)...
Docket No.
23-796
Case
Ficep Corporation v. Peddinghaus Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Ficep invented and claimed a method of manufacturing components (like steel beams) of a larger structure (like the skeleton of a building). The claims specifically recite a method of manufacturing...
Docket No.
23-779
Case
Forsythe v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“To ensure that veterans’ claims are presented to agency decisionmakers with all available support, Congress has directed the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to notify each claimant of ‘any information,...
Docket No.
23-768
Case
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Section 103 of title 35 of the U.S. Code provides that an invention is not patentable if it ‘would have been obvious’ to a person of ordinary skill in the...
Docket No.
23-740
Case
Golden v. Qualcomm, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-739
Case
Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In conducting an obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103, did the Federal Circuit err in holding that there ‘is no basis in our case law’ for requiring an articulated...
Docket No.
23-7384
Case
Mandry v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether participation in the Congress-authorized 2017 and 2020 plebiscite for Puerto Ricans, on statehood elections, constitutes an implied in fact contract for the purposes of a Tucker Act claim...