Petitions - Fed Circuit Blog

| Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Search By

Status

Subject

137 Petitions

Docket No.

Case

Subject

Status

Question(s) Presented

Automotive Body Parts Ass'n v. Ford Global Technologies, LLC

Question(s) Presented

“How should the article of manufacture be determined when applying the patent exhaustion and repair doctrines in design patent cases?”

Khan v. United States

Question(s) Presented

1.1 “Federal Circuit’s Application of the Plausibility Standard to Weigh Evidence Against Plaintiff Conflicts With This Court’s Precedent In Twombly and Iqbal As It Nullifies Procedural Due Process Under The...

Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Did the Federal Circuit err in concluding that it had jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision to institute inter partes review of Bennett’s ’029 patent over Bennett’s objection that...

Sade Mone v. United States

Question(s) Presented

“The United States Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction over a wide range of claims against the government including but not limited to, contract disputes. When more than $10,000 is...

Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“The question presented is whether patents that claim a method of medically treating a patient automatically satisfy Section 101 of the Patent Act, even if they apply a natural law...

HP Inc. v. Berkheimer

Question(s) Presented

“The question presented is whether patent eligibility is a question of law for the court based on the scope of the claims or a question of fact for the jury...

Zimmer, Inc. v. Stryker Corp.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether enhanced patent damages can be awarded without regard to whether there was an objectively high risk of infringement based on a finding of negligence, as opposed to a...

Enplas Display Device Corp. vs. Seoul Semiconductor Co.

Question(s) Presented

“Whether, in view of the presumption against extraterritoriality, a foreign defendant’s foreign sales of components to a foreign company qualifies as induced infringement, where the defendant knew of, at most,...

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a single-step patent claim that describes its point of novelty solely in functional terms violates the rule against functional claiming set forth in Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v....

Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“During the patent infringement jury trial in this case, the district court found defendant-respondent Apple, Inc. (‘Apple’) had ‘waived’ any construction for a key claim limitation. The court thus instructed...

Sunoco, Inc. v. United States

Question(s) Presented

“Whether the Federal Circuit properly held that tax credits operate as a reduction of tax liability rather than as a payment of taxes owed.”...

Glasswall Solutions Ltd. v. Clearswift Ltd.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Where a threshold patent-eligibility determination under 35 U.S.C. § 101 is presented in a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may...

Senju Pharmaceutical Co. v. Akorn, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether 35 U.S.C. § 144’s directive that the Federal Circuit “shall issue . . . its mandate and opinion” in all appeals from the Patent and Trademark Office precludes...

Yankton County, South Dakota v. United States

Question(s) Presented

“In an inverse condemnation case in which the taking arose out of a gradual and continuous physical process put in motion by the Government, may the claimant postpone filing suit...

Princeton Digital Image Corp. v. Adobe Systems Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the court below erroneously held, in conflict with a decision of the Third Circuit, that it may vacate a district court’s consent final judgment and instruct the district...

Question(s) Presented

“Section 134 of the Patent Act provides that an ‘applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner...

Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“The question presented is whether objective indicia of nonobviousness may be partially or entirely discounted where the development of the invention was allegedly ‘blocked’ by the existence of a prior...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7