Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
641 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
25-17
Case
D R Burton Healthcare, LLC v. Trudell Medical International Inc.
Subject
Procedure
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a district court’s order changing the time to trial in its case management order from at least 326 days to 146 days, and its time for completion of all...
Docket No.
25-169
Case
Lowe v. ShieldMark, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether a district court, after first deciding it lacks subject matter jurisdiction and dismissing with prejudice a cause of action, retains the power to declare an ‘alternative’ decision on...
Docket No.
25-164
Case
Baker v. Social Security Administration
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Congress has enacted a statute to protect whistle­blowers under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1514(a). This Court has held that an employee does not have to prove, ‘retaliatory intent,’...
Docket No.
25-158
Case
R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. v. Altria Client Services LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Most products are made up of numerous components and features, patented and unpatented both. Their commercial success may be attributable to consumer demand for their patented features, or demand for...
Docket No.
25-149
Case
United States Automobile Association v. PNC Bank N.A.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“’It is a fundamental principle of administrative law that agencies must treat like cases alike.’ . . . Thus, in the D.C. Circuit, an agency decision that ‘[f]ail[s] to distinguish...
Docket No.
25-144
Case
Foster, APC v. Stewart
Subject
Lanham Act
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit improperly considered government developments that postdate a trademark applicant’s filing to support a refusal under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, despite the applicant’s statutory...
Docket No.
25-1196
Case
McKinney v. Collins
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Administrative Procedure Act (‘APA’) provides that ‘[e]ach agency shall give an interested person the right to petition for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule.’ 5 U.S.C. §...
Docket No.
25-1132
Case
Rideshare Displays, Inc. v. Lyft, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit has wrongly applied this Court’s and its own precedent in disregarding key functional limitations of the claims that implement the improvement to the claimed invention...
Docket No.
25-1127
Case
United States v. Cotter Corp.
Subject
Gov. Contract
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Price-Anderson Act, Pub. L. No. 85-256, 71 Stat. 576, authorized the federal government to ‘enter into agreements of indemnification with its contractors’ under ‘contracts for the benefit of the...
Docket No.
25-1114
Case
EscapeX IP, LLC v. Google LLC
Subject
Sanctions
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “The Ninth Circuit has long held that sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 ‘must be supported by a finding of subjective bad faith,’ and that bad faith may be...
Docket No.
25-1104
Case
CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Federal Circuit can affirm a PTAB decision without in contravention of the clear statutory requirement of an ‘opinion’ when reviewing such...
Docket No.
25-1068
Case
CAO Lighting, Inc. v. Wolfspeed, Inc.
Subject
Rule 36Amicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Federal Circuit’s use of its Local Rule 36, which allows summary affirmance without opinion, (a) improperly defers to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s interpretations of law in...
Docket No.
25-1021
Case
Jackson v. Department of Homeland Security
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Federal Circuit erred in denying equitable tolling under the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act where the agency’s failure to respond to Freedom of...
Docket No.
25-1012
Case
HMTX Industries, LLC v. United States
Subject
Trade3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Section 301(b) of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2411 (the ‘Trade Act’), permits the U.S. Trade Representative (‘USTR’) to take all ‘appropriate and feasible action’ to ‘obtain...
Docket No.
24-997
Case
Doyle v. United States
Subject
TakingsAmicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under Knick v. Township of Scott, 588 U.S. 180 (2019), a regulatory takings claim is ripe for adjudication in federal court when the government reaches a final decision concerning any...
Docket No.
24-950
Case
Bhagat v. United States Patent and Trademark Office
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Respondents and the U.S. patent courts are obstructing advancement in nutrition and prevention by unlawfully denying patents, neutering innovation in piecemeal patents, and arbitrarily forcing absurdly narrow patents causing...
Docket No.
24-944
Case
Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“28 U.S.C. § 455 outlines the grounds for disqualification of judges and magistrates due to potential biases or conflicts of interest. This Honorable Court has previously highlighted the fact that:...
Docket No.
24-916
Case
Koss Corporation v. Bose Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In this case, the Federal Circuit precedentially adopted a novel and expansive rule of collateral estoppel (or issue preclusion) that bypasses key requirements this Court has established.” “In [the] first case,...
Docket No.
24-903
Case
Atturo Tire Corp. v. Toyo Tire Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Respondent Toyo, one of the world’s largest tire companies, filed a complaint with the federal International Trade Commission (‘ITC’) against a group of tire manufacturers and distributors. Petitioner Atturo, a...
Docket No.
24-893
Case
Katz v. Department of Justice
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit erred in denying the request for a rehearing en banc, given that Eric Katz suffered through a hostile work environment and was punished for being...