Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
506 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
19-1252
Case
Campbell v. United States
Subject
Tucker Act3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Does the Tucker Act’s statute of limitations for a regulatory takings claim accrue when the Government makes a final decision, or when the plaintiff’s property rights are actually injured-in-fact as...
Docket No.
19-1232
Case
Bank v. Al Johnson’s Swedish Restaurant & Butik, Inc.
Subject
Trademark
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “In Matal v. Tam, 137 S. Ct. 1744 (2017), this Court held that the disparagement clause of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a), which ‘prohibit[s]...
Docket No.
19-1228
Case
Kaneka Corporation v. Xiamen Kingdomway Group Company
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether under Rule 36 of the Federal Circuit’s Rules of Procedure the Federal Circuit may affirm a judgment of non-infringement without opinion and on alternative grounds first raised by...
Docket No.
19-1204
Case
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In 2011, Congress enacted a potent new mechanism for challenging patents through adversarial proceedings at the Patent Office known as inter partes review. See Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L....
Docket No.
19-120
Case
IBG LLC v. Trading Technologies International, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The America Invents Act, Pub. L. No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011), and its attendant regulations establish a program for review of the eligibility and validity of ‘covered business method’...
Docket No.
19-1198
Case
CANVS Corp. v. Barrett
Subject
Gov. Contract
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Can the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, an administrative panel, deprive a corporation of valuable intellectual property without due process?” 2. “Does due process require the ASBCA to consider...
Docket No.
19-1177
Case
American Institute for International Steel, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Trade4 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“This case presents a facial challenge to section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1862, which the President has used to impose to...
Docket No.
19-1173
Case
Comcast Corp. v. International Trade Commission
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit’s judgment should be vacated as moot and remanded with instructions to vacate the Commission’s orders, pursuant to United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36...
Docket No.
19-1147
Case
Willowood, LLC v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether liability for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §271(g) requires that all steps of a patented process must be practiced by, or at least attributable to, a single entity,...
Docket No.
19-1134
Case
Baley v. United States
Subject
Takings6 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Petitioners are a plaintiff class of Oregon and California farmers and ranchers who depend on their water rights in the Klamath River basin to irrigate their land. When the U.S....
Docket No.
19-1132
Case
Blackbird Tech LLC v. Health in Motion LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“35 U.S.C. § 285 provides that a court ‘in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.’ In Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.,...
Docket No.
19-1131
Case
Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. v. Nalpropion Pharmaceuticals LLC
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, a patent’s specification must ‘contain a written description of the invention.’ That requirement, a cornerstone of federal patent law, ensures that an inventor can claim...
Docket No.
19-1129
Case
Fote v. Iancu
Subject
Rule 36
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a court of appeals must provide an opinion explaining its reasoning in an appeal that involves a complex and unsettled area of the law and in which a written...
Docket No.
19-1124
Case
Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Ale USA Inc.
Subject
Patent5 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Chrimar brought an action for infringement against ALE under four patents. A jury rejected ALE’s invalidity defenses and awarded past damages. The District Court then awarded post-judgment ongoing royalties. The...
Docket No.
19-1110
Case
Board of Regents of the University of Texas System v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a state’s sovereign right to try its causes within its borders when there is personal jurisdiction over the defendant renders unconstitutional a federal patent venue statute applied to force...
Docket No.
19-1103
Case
INO Therapeutics LLC v. Praxair Distribution Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a method of treatment that requires doctors to selectively administer a drug to certain patients and not others to enhance patient outcomes is eligible for patent protection under Section...
Docket No.
19-1097
Case
Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Company
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In 2006, the Patent Office issued petitioner’s patent under a statutory scheme that guaranteed that an issued patent is presumed valid in adversarial proceedings until a challenger proves that it...
Docket No.
19-1074
Case
Celgene Corp. v. Peter
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether retroactive application of inter partes review to patents issued before passage of the America Invents Act violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth...
Docket No.
19-1073
Case
Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “In light of a patent’s presumption of validity under 35 U.S.C. § 282 and the concomitant clear and convincing standard for proving invalidity, may patent claims that cover a...
Docket No.
19-1062
Case
CJ ChellJedang Corp. v. International Trade Commission
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether, to avoid prosecution history estoppel under Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., ‘the rationale underlying the amendment’ must be the rationale the patentee provided to the public...