Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
506 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-1039
Case
Wynkoop v. Department of Defense
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Can the Federal Government violate a Federal Employee’s 5th Amendment right by depriving a federal employee of his or her property right (job) without due process-the right to respond...
Docket No.
20-1003
Case
Christy, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “When a duly-issued patent is invalidated through a post-grant review process (such as an IPR), must compensation be paid under the Takings Clause?” 2. “When a duly-issued patent is invalidated...
Docket No.
19A886
Case
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
No question presented.
Docket No.
19-8844
Case
Piccone v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Are Attorneys undergoing bar disciplinary proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to determine whether they may continue to practice their chosen profession, entitled to material exculpatory information...
Docket No.
19-8750
Case
Arunachalam v. SAP America, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the inventor’s government-issued patent contract grant is protected by the Constitution of the United States. If so,” 2. “Whether the inventor’s government-issued patent contract grant is impaired by the...
Docket No.
19-8708
Case
Arunachalam v. Presidio Bank
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether this Court’s duty to enforce its Governing Precedents as declared by Chief Justice J. Marshall in Fletcher v. Peck (1810) and Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, (1819)...
Docket No.
19-8707
Case
Arunachalam v. Apple, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the USPTO/PTAB (the “Agency”) and Federal Circuit were aware of the prohibition of the Constitution mandated by this Court against repudiating Government-issued contract grants prior to the enactment...
Docket No.
19-8671
Case
Arunachalam v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether it is ‘misprision of treason’ that eight Justices remained silent of Chief Justice Roberts’ conflict of interest against inventors as a member of the Knights of Malta with...
Docket No.
19-852
Case
Maxell, Ltd. v. Fandango Media, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the claims at issue in Maxell’s patents are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. 101, as interpreted in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208...
Docket No.
19-832
Case
Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
Subject
Patent4 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “A patented invention often makes but a small contribution to a complex end-product’s value. Thus, for well over a century, this Court has enforced the rule that a patentee...
Docket No.
19-829
Case
Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“When a party files a petition for Inter Partes Review, the petition ‘must identify “each claim challenged,” the grounds for the challenge, and the evidence supporting the challenge. § 312(a)(3).’...
Docket No.
19-819
Case
Procopio v. Wilkie
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether This Court Should Grant Certiorari to Resolve an Important Point of Law Concerning the Applicability of the ‘Substantially Justified’ Standard In Adjudicating Petitions for Attorneys Fees Under the...
Docket No.
19-8094
Case
Motupalli v. Iancu
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Does the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (‘AIA’) permit the United States to retroactively apply a scintilla of inadequacy in Pre-AIA to overturn precedent by insisting that it be a...
Docket No.
19-801
Case
Cruz v. Wilkie
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Over the last decade since Congress passed remedial legislation creating Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation (‘FVEC’), an astronomical fifty-six percent (56%) of all claimants have been denied that one-time benefit by...
Docket No.
19-7588
Case
Bible v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether the Federal Circuit correctly affirmed the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the claim in Bible’s...
Docket No.
19-748
Case
Lepore v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
MSPB
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The calculation of annuities for government employees upon their retirement is governed by 5 U.S.C. 8331(4). This section requires a determination of ‘the largest annual rate resulting from averaging an...
Docket No.
19-7399
Case
Harris v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Why was my demand denied when the defendant, the Commissioner of the IRS, admitted in writing that they didn’t have jurisdiction to take my...
Docket No.
19-705
Case
Sharpe v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“This case concerns the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and its inexplicable refusal under 10 U.S.C. § 1552(c) to calculate, with respect to certain military pay and allowances, which...
Docket No.
19-6900
Case
Smith v. Wilkie
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“This Court in Buckhannon addressed an award of prevailing party attorneys’ fees pursuant to Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 due to voluntary...
Docket No.
19-671
Case
Grover v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
MSPB
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the deference standard regarding federal agencies interpretation of their own regulations must continue in the light of the admission by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that if its...