Home
Opinions
En Banc
Supreme Court
Other Cases
Administration
All Posts
Opinion Posts
News
SCOTUS Activity
En Banc Activity
Panel Activity
Search
All
Posts
Opinions
En Banc Cases
En Banc Petitions
Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Petitions
Other Cases
Search
|
Sitemap
Contact
Sign Up
Home
Opinions
En Banc
Cases
Petitions
Supreme Court
Cases
Petitions
Other Cases
Administration
Supreme Court Petitions
Search By
Status
Any
Pending
Granted
Denied
Dismissed
Subject
Any
Asbestos
Antitrust
Attorney Client Privilege
Attorney Fees
Bankruptcy
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act
Clean Water Act
Contract
Compensation Clause
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Copyright
Death Benefit
Disqualification
EAJA
Eminent Domain
Employment
Equal Pay Act
Errata
Fair Labor Standards Act
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Financial
Foreign Relations Authorization Act
Gov. Contract
Indian Tucker Act
IRS
Jurisdiction
Lanham Act
Little Tucker Act
Military
MSPB
Nuclear Waste
Order
Patent
Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act
Plant Variety Protection Act
Postal
Procedure
Pro Se
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Rule 36
Rule 50
Sanctions
Standing
Takings
Tax
Tucker Act
Trade
Trademark
Trade Secret
Vaccine
Vaccine Act
Veterans
511 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
21-513
Case
Australian Leather Pty. Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.
Subject
Trademark
Amicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“For decades, Australians have referred to a style of sheepskin boots using the generic term ‘ugg.’ This generic term came to the United States in the 1960s and 1970s and...
Docket No.
21-465
Case
Kisor v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 2400 (2019), this Court vacated the Federal Circuit’s holding that the word ‘relevant’ in a veteran’s-benefit regulation was ambiguous. It remanded for the...
Docket No.
21-457
Case
ENCO Systems, Inc. v. DaVincia, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“ENCO owns and practices a patent for a system and method for automatically converting human speech carried in an audio-visual signal into the text captions that appear on one’s TV...
Docket No.
21-438
Case
Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v. Daktronics, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Amicus
CVSG
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 US 370 (1996), this Court held that the meaning of terms in a patent ‘claim’ stands as a question of law and must...
Docket No.
21-430
Case
West v. United States
Subject
Tucker Act
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“As a matter of statutory construction and application, is petitioner entitled to the exercise of the authority of the United States Federal Court of Claims under 28 U.S.C. §1491(a)(2) to...
Docket No.
21-421
Case
Nastri v. Department of Homeland Security
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Can the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (hereafter MSPB, or Board); make decisions; solicit, hire, promote, transfer, reassign, or fire staff; select, refer, refuse, adjudicate or dismiss cases; retain in-house...
Docket No.
21-413
Case
Infinity Computer Products, Inc. v. Oki Data Americas, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a patent claim is indefinite under § 112, ¶ 2, if conflicting positions about a claim term arise during the patent prosecution process, even if uncontradicted expert testimony established...
Docket No.
21-38
Case
Gossage v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the 60-day filing deadline is subject to equitable tolling beyond the control of the Petitioner or under ‘Unique or Personal Circumstances’ is warranted for ‘Want of Service’ or...
Docket No.
21-37
Case
Gossage v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit has [j]urisdiction or ‘lacks jurisdiction’ to determine its original and lower court’s jurisdiction in OPM Investigation Case 01-904-277 and OPM’s December 27, 2004 final decision,...
Docket No.
21-364
Case
Mohapatra v. Hirshfeld
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether computer-based process improvement patent applications for inventions by Citizen Inventors–characterized by narrow and well-defined practical solutions to clearly identified actual/existing problems which do not preempt any future inventions–[as a...
Docket No.
21-36
Case
Gossage v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether Petitioner has standing to correct a jurisdictional error before the [l]ower [c]ourts for ‘want of jurisdiction’ or ‘jurisdiction on the merits,’ based on OPM’s December 27, 2004, final...
Docket No.
21-35
Case
Gossage v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit has [j]urisdiction or ‘lacks jurisdiction’ to determine its original and lower court’s jurisdiction in OPM Investigation Case 01-904-277 and its December 27, 2004 final decision,...
Docket No.
21-249
Case
Bondyopadhyay v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
21-245
Case
Pyrotechnic Specialties, Inc. v. Secretary of Defense
Subject
Gov. Contract
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Is a litigant entitled to have the correct standard of law applied by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals or does a ‘right for any reason’ doctrine apply?” “Is a...
Docket No.
21-244
Case
Taylor & Sons, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Does the fact that the property is generating profits on the date of taking satisfy the economic impact requirement to find a regulatory taking under Penn Central?” “Does Penn Central provide...
Docket No.
21-233
Case
Mike Finnin Motors, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the novel Federal Circuit ‘but for’ defense to takings liability conflicts with Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States, 568 U.S. 23 (2012) (categorical defenses are barred in...
Docket No.
21-209
Case
Hu v. Hirshfeld
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the PTO’s varied standards, buttressed by the decisional law of the lower reviewing courts, for determining operability under § 101 are biased towards conventional inventions but against groundbreaking...
Docket No.
21-202
Case
Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V.
Subject
Patent
3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Does 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) categorically preclude appeal of all decisions not to institute inter partes review?” 2. “Is the NHK-Fintiv Rule substantively and procedurally...
Docket No.
21-193
Case
Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Can a document qualify as a printed publication if it is stored on a password-protected website, not accessible to the public, and available only to customers who pay over $25,000...
Docket No.
21-170
Case
Rain Computing, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether a patent claim may be invalidated for indefiniteness only if, under 35 U.S.C. § 112, para. 2 (now subsection 112(b)) as construed by Nautilus, Inc. u. Biosig Instruments,...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19