Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
511 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-158
Case
SRAM, LLC v. FOX Factory, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that, under 35 U.S.C. § 103, before a nexus can be presumed between objective indicia of nonobviousness and the patent claim, a patentee...
Docket No.
20-1552
Case
Naked TM, LLC v. Australian Therapeutic Supplies Pty. Ltd.
Subject
Lanham Act
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “A majority of a Federal Circuit panel ruled that respondent has standing under 15 U.S.C. § 1064 to cancel petitioner’s trademark registration even though respondent had already agreed that...
Docket No.
20-1545
Case
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether under 35 U.S.C. § 271 and this Court’s precedent, a patentee may prove literal infringement by relying solely on the essentiality of its patent to an industry standard,...
Docket No.
20-1536
Case
United States v. Common Ground Healthcare Cooperative
Subject
Tucker Act
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that Congress intended to afford insurers an implied money-damages remedy as compensation for CSR payments that were not made because the government...
Docket No.
20-1532
Case
Garvey v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Under Chevron step 1, is it permissible for the Secretary to write a regulation that redefines a ‘veteran’ where Congress has provided a clear, unambiguous definition?” 2. “In the alternative...
Docket No.
20-1517
Case
Fast 101 Pty. Ltd. v. Citigroup Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “When analyzing patent claims for subject matter eligibility ‘as a whole,’ does a court need to evaluate the differences between prior art allegations and the alleged inventive concept in...
Docket No.
20-150
Case
ThermoLife International LLC v. Iancu
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit violated the Chenery doctrine by making new factual findings in the first instance on appeal to affirm a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal...
Docket No.
20-1486
Case
Hollie v. Wilkie
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Did the Federal Circuit err in dismissing Petitioner’s appeal from the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Affairs for lack of jurisdiction?” 2. “Did the Federal Circuit err in failing...
Docket No.
20-1468
Case
Dupuch-Carron v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Subject
Vaccine Act
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Does the ordinary meaning of the words of section 11(c)(1)(B)(i)(III) of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (the NCVIA or ‘Vaccine Act’), 42 USC § 300aa-11(c) (1)(B)(i)(III), require that...
Docket No.
20-1452
Case
Sasso v. Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether this is a case ‘arising under’ federal patent laws under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a) within the Federal Circuit’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1) when cross-respondents chose not to...
Docket No.
20-1451
Case
Nixon v. General Motors Corporation
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-1437
Case
Optimum Services, Inc. v. Secretary of the Interior
Subject
Contract
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
I. Is an agency’s termination for convenience of a contract for voluntary corrective action in response to the filing of a post-award bid protest in the Court of Federal Claims...
Docket No.
20-1432
Case
United States v. Maine Community Health Options
Subject
Tucker Act
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that Congress intended to afford insurers an implied money-damages remedy as compensation for CSR payments that were not made because Congress declined...
Docket No.
20-1420
Case
Roadie, Inc. v. Baggage Airline Guest Services, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether District Court judges should be required to consider the weakness of an infringement ii claim, after ruling in favor of the defendant on invalidity, where, as here, (i)...
Docket No.
20-1412
Case
NetSoc, LLC v. Match Group, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Is the addition of a network computer implemented social network, with a novel and unconventional rating system, to a method of organizing human activity per se unpatentable as directed...
Docket No.
20-1396
Case
Tormasi v. Western Digital Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Does imprisonment (1) forfeit a patent owner’s right not to be deprived of personal property without due process of law and (2) render a person wholly without equal protection...
Docket No.
20-1394
Case
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Patreon, Inc.
Subject
Patent2 AmiciCVSG
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit correctly interpreted Kessler to create a freestanding preclusion doctrine that may apply even when claim and issue preclusion do not.” 2. “Whether the Federal Circuit properly...
Docket No.
20-1380
Case
Security People, Inc. v. Hirshfeld
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the retroactive application of inter partes review under the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011), the ‘AIA’, to Petitioner’s patent issued eight...
Docket No.
20-1363
Case
Merit Medical Systems, Inc. v. Khan
Subject
Attorney Fees
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“If this Court determines in Case No. 20-773 that the Federal Circuit erred in affirming the award of attorney fees as sanctions under Rule 11, should this Court also vacate...
Docket No.
20-135
Case
Customedia Technologies, LLC v. Dish Network Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether a court of appeals can invoke forfeiture to refuse to address an Appointments Clause violation in a pending appeal despite an intervening change in law.” 2. “Whether the PTAB...