Home
Opinions
En Banc
Supreme Court
Other Cases
Administration
All Posts
Opinion Posts
News
SCOTUS Activity
En Banc Activity
Panel Activity
Search
All
Posts
Opinions
En Banc Cases
En Banc Petitions
Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Petitions
Other Cases
Search
|
Sitemap
Contact
Sign Up
Home
Opinions
En Banc
Cases
Petitions
Supreme Court
Cases
Petitions
Other Cases
Administration
Supreme Court Petitions
Search By
Status
Any
Pending
Granted
Denied
Dismissed
Subject
Any
Asbestos
Antitrust
Attorney Client Privilege
Attorney Fees
Bankruptcy
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act
Clean Water Act
Contract
Compensation Clause
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Copyright
Death Benefit
Disqualification
EAJA
Eminent Domain
Employment
Equal Pay Act
Errata
Fair Labor Standards Act
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Financial
Foreign Relations Authorization Act
Gov. Contract
Indian Tucker Act
IRS
Jurisdiction
Lanham Act
Little Tucker Act
Military
MSPB
Nuclear Waste
Order
Patent
Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act
Plant Variety Protection Act
Postal
Procedure
Pro Se
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Rule 36
Rule 50
Sanctions
Standing
Takings
Tax
Tucker Act
Trade
Trademark
Trade Secret
Vaccine
Vaccine Act
Veterans
511 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-7490
Case
Phillips v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-7472
Case
Patel v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-7365
Case
Russomanno v. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-7357
Case
Collier v. President of Stanford
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-7324
Case
Fisher v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-722
Case
Calapristi v. United States
Subject
Gov. Contract
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In Lynch v. United States, 292 U.S. 571, 579 (1934) the Court held that when the United States enters into contractual relations, its rights and duties therein are governed generally...
Docket No.
22-7104
Case
Conteh v. Department of Commerce
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-6915
Case
McCormick v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-69
Case
Ampersand Chowchilla BioMass, LLC v. United States
Subject
Tax
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Congress has incentivized the use of renewable, alternative energy sources by providing tax benefits to taxpayers who produce electricity at or invest in qualifying energy property. Eligibility for these benefits...
Docket No.
22-671
Case
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. HEC Pharm Co.
Subject
Patent
3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether 28 U.S.C. § 46 and principles of sound judicial administration preclude a court of appeals from adding a new judge to form a new panel and redecide a...
Docket No.
22-6405
Case
Smith v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The question presented for review is whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings,...
Docket No.
22-639
Case
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Subject
Patent
3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 (‘FVRA’) establishes ‘the exclusive means for temporarily authorizing an acting official to perform the functions and duties’ of a vacant presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed...
Docket No.
22-6223
Case
Woods v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “The Pullman-Standard, 456 U.S. 273 (1982), this Court developed which is the standard for reviewing jurisprudence for issues of fact and issues of law, and held the Court of Appeals,...
Docket No.
22-6093
Case
London v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under 31 U.S.C. § 3702(b), ‘A claim against the Government presented under this section must . . . be received by the official responsible . . . for settling the...
Docket No.
22-605
Case
Military-Veterans Advocacy Inc. v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether under the United States v. Munsingwear 340 U.S. 36 (1950) [holding that where mootness prevents appellate review, the decision below should be vacated] the Court should grant certiorari...
Docket No.
22-604
Case
Janke v. Vidal
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Can a known patentable product become ineligible for patenting when it is claimed to be made by applying a mathematical model of the product on a 3D printer, as...
Docket No.
22-5999
Case
Flores-Vazquez v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-5793
Case
Forrest v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Supreme Court erred in their interpretation of the Internal Revenue Code in United States v. Brockamp, 519 U.S. 347 (1997) by disallowing equitable tolling in all circumstances...
Docket No.
22-5670
Case
Aljindi v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-565
Case
USP Holdings, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Trade
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit correctly held that the Secretary of Commerce’s determination that steel imports threaten to impair national security under Section 232(b)(3)(A) of the Trade...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15