Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
511 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-313
Case
Acer America Corporation v. Intellisoft, Ltd.
Subject
Jurisdiction
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Where Plaintiffs’ theories of trade secret ownership, misappropriation, and damages depend on deciding the patent law issues of inventorship, claim construction, and infringement, does Plaintiffs’ claim ‘necessarily arise,’ under...
Docket No.
20-273
Case
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Rovi Guides, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the United States Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers...
Docket No.
20-271
Case
Vilox Technologies, LLC v. Iancu
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the court of appeals’ severance remedy of the Appointments Clause violation of Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) is consistent with congressional intent, where Congress has long considered tenure protections...
Docket No.
20-260
Case
Personal Audio, LLC v. CBS Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Must the collateral estoppel effect of an inter partes review be raised and litigated in the appeal of the inter partes review, rather than in the court in which...
Docket No.
20-258
Case
Medina v. Federal Aviation Administration
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Alvin E Medina, the Petitioners, request this Petition for Writ of Certiorari be granted given the salient issue equitable tolling, and the constitutional matter of proper notice of appeal rights...
Docket No.
20-228
Case
ESIP Series 2, LLC v. Puzhen Life USA, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether Board decisions that are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the Board’s statutory jurisdiction from the start, and are made by administrative patent judges holding that position in violation of...
Docket No.
20-1809
Case
VoIP-Pal.Com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is ‘directed to’ a patent-ineligible concept under step one of the Court’s two-step framework for determining whether an...
Docket No.
20-1760
Case
iLife Technologies, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is “directed to” a patent-ineligible concept under step 1 of the Court’s two-step framework for determining whether an...
Docket No.
20-1746
Case
Sharifi v. United States
Subject
Tucker Act
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a United States citizen can be denied his Fifth Amendment rights to just compensation for property taken by the United States based upon foreign...
Docket No.
20-1726
Case
Meidinger v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “What are each courts’ jurisdiction authority and limitations of Whistleblower contracts of the Tax Court, and the Federal Claims Court, created under 26 USC § 7623(b)?” 2. “What are each...
Docket No.
20-1714
Case
Mooney v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Who has Standing against the Mooneys as the Plaintiff and being the [] Real Party of Interest in the ‘Courts of the United States’ arising under Article III Sections...
Docket No.
20-1700
Case
Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Does retroactive application of the inter partes review process violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution?” 2. “Does the use of Federal Circuit...
Docket No.
20-1697
Case
Kimble v. United States
Subject
Tax
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Did the Court err in holding that Alice acted willfully, despite the lack of proof either that she had knowledge of the requirement to file an FBAR or of...
Docket No.
20-1691
Case
Robinson v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Did the court of appeals violate constitutional rights of ‘[d]ue process’ and ‘[e]qual protection’ when it deferred to the [Board of Veterans’ Appeals] and failed to review according to...
Docket No.
20-167
Case
Michelson v. Department of the Army
Subject
MSPB
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit erred by reviewing a Merit System Protection Board Administrative Judge’s decision that a medical note provided after the disciple was proposed on a substantial evidence...
Docket No.
20-1654
Case
Sonos, Inc. v. Implicit, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether administrative patent judges are ‘principal’ or ‘inferior’ Officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause.”
Docket No.
20-1617
Case
Earley v. Hirshfeld
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Can the ‘burden of proof’ regarding inherency shift if the Court (US Court of Appeals/Federal Circuit) and Board (US Patent Trial and Appeal Board) have not determined or demonstrated that...
Docket No.
20-1604
Case
Biogen MA Inc. v. EMD Serono, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether courts may disregard the express claim term ‘recombinant’ so as to render a method-of-treatment patent anticipated—and thus invalid—in light of prior-art treatments that used the naturally occurring human protein,...
Docket No.
20-160
Case
Halim v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “What are the limits on due diligence?” 2. “Do government officials act in good faith all the time?” 3. “Can the government punish the petitioner for reasons [b]eyond his control?” 4. “Can...
Docket No.
20-1589
Case
Kaszuba v. Hirshfeld
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Has the Federal Circuit erred in refusing to follow this Court’s Lexmark precedent, and in not applying precedent to standing under 15 U.S.C. § 1064.” 2. “Has the Federal Circuit...