Micron Technology, Inc. v. North Star Innovations, Inc.


Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who must be appointed by the President with the Senate’s advice and consent, or ‘inferior Officers’ whose appointment Congress has permissibly appointed in a department head.”

2. “Whether the court of appeals erred by allowing a patent owner that did not present an Appointments Clause challenge to the agency, and that acquiesced in the appointment of the same administrative patent judges in a related matter, to nonetheless present such challenges on appeal.”

Posts About this Case

Proceedings and Orders
January 6, 2021
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
June 21, 2021
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
June 28, 2021
Petition DENIED.