1. “Has this Court’s Alice exception to patent-eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 been improperly expanded to cover computer-implemented inventions that, while not necessarily improving the functioning of a computer, do ‘effect an improvement in [another] technology or technical field’?”
2. “Should courts acts as fact finders in determining material factual issues underlying patent-eligibility under § 101?”
3. “Should the abstract-idea exception to § 101 require considering pre-emption?”
