Drevaleva v. United States

 
DOCKET NO.
OP. BELOW
SUBJECT
Pro Se

Question(s) Presented

1. “Can the U.S. Court of Federal Claims compel an indigent Title VII Plaintiff to pay a filing fee at the time when the Plaintiff doesn’t have money at all, and the Plaintiff is financially ineligible to pay a filing fee?”

2. “Can the U.S. Court of Federal Claims compel the indigent Plaintiff to pay a filing fee ‘within 10 days’ without identifying from what date the calculation of the time starts – from the date when the Court issues an Order or from the date when the Plaintiff received this Order in mail?”

3. “Can the U.S. Court of Federal Claims dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint on the basis that the Plaintiff failed to pay a filing fee within 10 days from the issuance of the Order if the Plaintiff filed a statement within seven days from the receiving of the Order in mail explaining that the Plaintiff didn’t have money to pay a filing fee at that moment, and the Plaintiff asked the Court to wait until I receive my salary?”

Posts About this Case

Date
Proceedings and Orders
September 24, 2020
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
October 13, 2020
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
November 10, 2020
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
December 7, 2020
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.