Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc.

 
DOCKET NO.
OP. BELOW
SUBJECT
Patent

Question(s) Presented

1. “Did the Federal Circuit err in concluding that it had jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision to institute inter partes review of Bennett’s ’029 patent over Bennett’s objection that it was time-barred?” 2. “Did the Federal Circuit err when it rejected the longstanding principle that a dismissal without prejudice leaves the parties as if a suit had never been brought, splitting the circuits?”

Posts About this Case

Date
Proceedings and Orders
December 18, 2018
Application (18A637) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 28, 2019.
February 12, 2019
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2019.
March 29, 2019
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 8, 2019.
May 28, 2019
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
June 17, 2019
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
April 20, 2020
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
April 27, 2020
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, 590 U. S. ___ (2020).
May 29, 2020
JUDGMENT ISSUED.