“The Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s Order, overlooking the significant fact that the presiding judge was disqualified due to a conflict of interest—revealed by his late admission of common stock ownership in the defendant three years post appeal—denying a citizen’s right to appeal and the inventor’s right to sue.”
1. “Can a Judge with stock issue a binding order in favor of the stock-issuing party?”
2. “Can a Judge rule on an appeal from the decision of a case or issue tried by him?”
3. “Can a Judge arbitrarily restrict a citizen’s right to appeal and the inventor’s right to sue while denying the citizen’s right to be heard and to an unbiased tribunal?”
4. “Should a Judge disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned?”
5. “Can a Judge deny or hinder access to the courts to a citizen upon the question of due process itself?”
6. “Can a judge arbitrarily deprive a citizen of liberty and property, from void orders by a judge with disqualifying financial interests, with no jury trial, hearing, notice of hearing, discovery, evidence nor basis in fact or the law?”
