1. “Who may appeal an adverse action to the Board?”
2. “Is a RULE 60 Motion, Fraud upon the court, sufficient basis for judicial intervention, review and decision on its merits?”
3. “Did the Appeals Court extend deference to agency resolutions of questions of law?”
4. “Does Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich, 510 U. S. 200 (1994) require courts to ask whether a ‘comprehensive review process’ exists for Veteran Preference Eligibles and VRA Eligibles in MSPB adjudications?”
4.”Does the longstanding solicitude of Congress for veterans and its special regard for veterans’ pro-veteran canon, as the U.S. Supreme Court has explained, stems from Congress’s intent to help veterans when enacting legislation providing them benefits, provide a righ to MSPB and court hearings where veteran benefits are at issue?”
5. “Does Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling (‘discrimination’ imply means to ‘treat worse.’ The law contains no ‘significance’ requirement or other hurdle for how large the harm must be. Any harm to a term or condition of employment will suffice.) implicate USERRA’s antidiscrimination provisions?”
6. “Is Department of Defense-Defense Logistics Agency required to prove the elements of ‘DUI’?”
7. “Does appellant’s assertion of his fifth amendment privilege during the MSPB proceedings risking his property right in his employment and criminal and civil penalties implicate the right to trial by jury and core Article III powers?”
