Petitions - Fed Circuit Blog

| Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Search By

Status

Subject

602 Petitions

Docket No.

Case

Subject

Status

Question(s) Presented

United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank N.A.

Question(s) Presented

“Congress has authorized inventors to patent ‘any new and useful process,’ or ‘any new and useful improvement thereof.’ 35 U.S.C. § 101. This Court has read § 101 to include...

Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. WhereverTV, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a court of appeals may override the principle of party presentation by deciding sua sponte a non-jurisdictional issue that a party deliberately...

Williamson v. Collins

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a federal appellate court may affirm the dismissal of a statutory claim without interpreting the governing statute, without applying the Administrative Procedure Act’s requirement that courts ‘decide all relevant...

Bright Data Ltd. v. Code200, UAB

Question(s) Presented

“This Court cautioned in Markman v. Westview Instruments, 517 U.S. 370, 390 (1996) that the ‘limits of a patent must be known’ to benefit the public and avoid a ‘zone...

Courtney v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Question(s) Presented

Siples v. Collins

Veterans5 Amici

Question(s) Presented

“In the uniquely pro-claimant veterans-benefits system, Congress has provided that an otherwise-final agency decision is subject to revision if that decision was based on ‘clear and unmistakable error,’ or ‘CUE.’...

Malik v. Collins

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether a catastrophically disabled veteran facing imminent, life threatening harm is entitled to mandamus relief under Martin v. O’Rourke when a government agency has unreasonably delayed implementation of a...

Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Synthego Corp.

Question(s) Presented

“A party challenging the validity of an issued patent in district court or in an inter partes review (‘IPR’) proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (‘PTAB’) bears the...

Mallonee v. Department of the Interior

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether a federal employee’s speech—reporting unsafe school conditions, unauthorized personnel practices, and retaliation to oversight bodies—is protected under the First Amendment, and whether the agency’s retaliation and judicial suppression...

United Water Conservation District v. United States

Question(s) Presented

“Whether the government’s appropriation of water that a person had a property right to use is analyzed as a physical taking, rather than a regulatory taking, under the Fifth...

Curtin v. United Trademark Holdings, Inc.

TrademarkAmicus

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a party desiring to participate in an administrative agency proceeding, including a trademark opposition proceeding at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, must satisfy the zone-of-interests and proximate-causation...

Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.

Question(s) Presented

“In the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Congress created an administrative procedure for challenging patents. Through that new procedure—called ‘inter partes review’—the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may review and possibly...

Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Pub. L. No. 95-223, Tit. II, 91 Stat. 1626, authorizes the tariffs imposed by President Trump pursuant to the national emergencies...

Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.

Patent3 AmiciCVSG

Question(s) Presented

“Congress passed the Hatch-Waxman Act ‘[t]o facilitate the approval of generic drugs as soon as patents allow.’ Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 405 (2012). ...

Soto v. United States

Veterans4 Amici

Question(s) Presented

“This case determines whether thousands of medically retired combat veterans should receive all the combat related special compensation (CRSC) that Congress specifically authorized for combat veterans. The government has elected...

Flynn v. Department of State

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...

Nordby v. Social Security Administration

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...

Feliciano v. Department of Transportation

Question(s) Presented

“This case presents a question of critical importance to hundreds of thousands of Americans who serve their country both as federal civilian employees and members of the Armed Services’ reserve...

Bufkin v. McDonough

Veterans9 Amici

Question(s) Presented

“For more than a century, veterans have been entitled to the benefit of the doubt on any close issue relating to their eligibility for service-related benefits. As presently codified, ‘[w]hen...

Harrow v. Department of Defense

Question(s) Presented

“When a federal employee petitions the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) provides:...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8