Petitions - Fed Circuit Blog

| Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Search By

Status

Subject

586 Petitions

Docket No.

Case

Subject

Status

Question(s) Presented

Malik v. Collins

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether a catastrophically disabled veteran facing imminent, life threatening harm is entitled to mandamus relief under Martin v. O’Rourke when a government agency has unreasonably delayed implementation of a...

Li v. Apple, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“Section 112(a) of Title 35 requires that a patent include a specification containing ‘a written description of the invention . . . in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms...

Nguyen v. Corporation of Catholic Archbishop

Question(s) Presented

Davie ex rel. Davie v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Question(s) Presented

Sheffield Korte Joint Venture v. Secretary of the Army

Question(s) Presented

“In a landmark decision, this Court held in United States v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132 (1918) (Spearin), that the federal government impliedly warrants to bidding contractors that a government furnished...

SurfCast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

Question(s) Presented

“Section 144 of the Patent Act directs the Federal Circuit to decide appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) by issuing ‘opinion[s].’ 35 U.S.C. § 144. Congress had...

Dinh v. United States

Question(s) Presented

“This Court has consistently held that, where the government authorizes a third party to take private property for public use, the government is liable for that taking. But the Federal...

Mallonee v. Department of the Interior

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether a federal employee’s speech—reporting unsafe school conditions, unauthorized personnel practices, and retaliation to oversight bodies—is protected under the First Amendment, and whether the agency’s retaliation and judicial suppression...

Behnamian v. Stewart

Question(s) Presented

“1. Whether a pro se plaintiff has properly served a defendant when the plaintiff serves the defendant himself at the advice of the court’s clerk and then the court’s clerk...

United Water Conservation District v. United States

Question(s) Presented

“Whether the government’s appropriation of water that a person had a property right to use is analyzed as a physical taking, rather than a regulatory taking, under the Fifth...

Recentive Analytics, Inc. v. Fox Corp.

Question(s) Presented

“Section 101 of the Patent Act provides that ‘any new and useful process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter’ is eligible for a patent. This Court has created judicial exceptions...

Champagne v. Collins

Question(s) Presented

“In order to receive disability benefits, a veteran must file a ‘specific claim in the form prescribed by the Secretary’ of Veterans Affairs. 38 U.S.C. § 5101(a). Department of Veterans...

Chinook Landing, LLC v. United States

Quiet Title Act

Question(s) Presented

“In 1955, Petitioner’s predecessor granted to the United States a transmission line easement, now managed by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). In March 2011, BPA officials approached Petitioner’s immediate predecessor,...

Curtin v. United Trademark Holdings, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a party desiring to participate in an administrative agency proceeding, including a trademark opposition proceeding at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, must satisfy the zone-of-interests and proximate-causation...

Percipient.ai, Inc. v. United States

Gov. Contract5 Amici

Question(s) Presented

“Congress has provided the Court of Federal Claims with exclusive jurisdiction to hear claims brought by ‘an interested party objecting to’ 1) ‘a solicitation by a Federal agency for bids...

PT Medisafe Technologies v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Question(s) Presented

“Does the ‘generic name’ requirement of the trademark statute, 15 U.S.C. § 1064(3), apply equally to all marks or is there a special rule for color...

Farrington v. Department of Transportation

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the Federal Circuit’s practice of issuing affirmances without opinion under Rule 36 in Merit Systems Protection Board cases unconstitutionally delegates Article III judicial power to the executive branch...

Wakefield v. Blackboard, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“A three-judge panel that includes a judge later suspended for disability cannot satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 46(b) ‘in the first instance.’ Just as a two-member NLRB lacked authority in New...

Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.

Question(s) Presented

“In the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Congress created an administrative procedure for challenging patents. Through that new procedure—called ‘inter partes review’—the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may review and possibly...

City of Fresno v. United States

Question(s) Presented

“To comply with Section 8 of the Reclamation Act of 1902, state water law must provide that ‘the right to the use of water acquired under the provisions of [the]...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8