Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
537 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
24-997
Case
Doyle v. United States
Subject
TakingsAmicus
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Under Knick v. Township of Scott, 588 U.S. 180 (2019), a regulatory takings claim is ripe for adjudication in federal court when the government reaches a final decision concerning any...
Docket No.
24-944
Case
Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“28 U.S.C. § 455 outlines the grounds for disqualification of judges and magistrates due to potential biases or conflicts of interest. This Honorable Court has previously highlighted the fact that:...
Docket No.
24-903
Case
Atturo Tire Corporation v. Toyo Tire Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Respondent Toyo, one of the world’s largest tire companies, filed a complaint with the federal International Trade Commission (‘ITC’) against a group of tire manufacturers and distributors. Petitioner Atturo, a...
Docket No.
24-889
Case
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Congress passed the Hatch-Waxman Act ‘[t]o facilitate the approval of generic drugs as soon as patents allow.’  Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 405 (2012). ...
Docket No.
24-866
Case
Converter Manufacturing, LLC v. Tekni-Plex, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“The statutory safeguard in Title 35 of the United States Code (the ‘Patent Act’) that prohibits patents on technologies like the teleportation beam from ‘Star Trek’ or the time traveling...
Docket No.
24-806
Case
Audio Evolution Diagnostics, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Applying this Court’s rulings in Alice and Mayo, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims invalidated plaintiff’s patents—not for a business method or computer program—but for a new and useful machine...
Docket No.
24-6804
Case
White v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Was the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit aware of the discrepancy and deliberately chose not [to] disclose that they would be using a different final order in...
Docket No.
24-635
Case
Celanese International Corp. v. International Trade Commission
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011 (‘AIA’), ‘[a] person shall be entitled to a patent unless * * * the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed...
Docket No.
24-1088
Case
Servant Health, LLC v. United States
Subject
Gov. Contract
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether an executive agency contracting officer may eliminate the requirement to exercise discretion by inserting contract language that nullifies the Federal Acquisition Regulation’s excusable delay protections in a commercial...
Docket No.
24-1058
Case
CloudofChange, LLC v. NCR Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“In Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc., 572 U.S. 915 (2014), the Court observed that ‘[t]he Federal Circuit’s analysis fundamentally misunderstands what it means to infringe a method patent.’...
Docket No.
23-868
Case
Flynn v. Department of State
Subject
MSPB2 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...
Docket No.
23-866
Case
Nordby v. Social Security Administration
Subject
MSPB
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...
Docket No.
24-320
Case
Soto v. United States
Subject
Veterans4 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“This case determines whether thousands of medically retired combat veterans should receive all the combat related special compensation (CRSC) that Congress specifically authorized for combat veterans. The government has elected...
Docket No.
23-861
Case
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation
Subject
MSPB10 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“This case presents a question of critical importance to hundreds of thousands of Americans who serve their country both as federal civilian employees and members of the Armed Services’ reserve...
Docket No.
23-713
Case
Bufkin v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans9 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“For more than a century, veterans have been entitled to the benefit of the doubt on any close issue relating to their eligibility for service-related benefits. As presently codified, ‘[w]hen...
Docket No.
23-21
Case
Harrow v. Department of Defense
Subject
MSPB5 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“When a federal employee petitions the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) provides:...
Docket No.
22-888
Case
Rudisill v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans16 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods of qualifying service under the Montgomery GI Bill, 38 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and under the Post-9/11 GI...
Docket No.
22-704
Case
Vidal v. Elster
Subject
Trademark8 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Section 1052(c) of Title 15 provides in pertinent part that a trademark shall be refused registration if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name . . . identifying a particular...
Docket No.
21-757
Case
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi
Subject
Patent38 AmiciCVSG
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Section 112 of the Patent Act provides that a patent’s ‘specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it,’...
Docket No.
21-432
Case
Arellano v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans7 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Under 38 U.S.C. § 5110(b)(1), ‘[t]he effective date of an award of disability compensation to a veteran shall be the day following the date of the veteran’s discharge or release...