Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
544 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
24-889
Case
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
Subject
Patent2 AmiciCVSG
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Congress passed the Hatch-Waxman Act ‘[t]o facilitate the approval of generic drugs as soon as patents allow.’  Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 405 (2012). ...
Docket No.
24-1281
Case
Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“This Court long has recognized that a patent is the private property of its owner, who has the constitutional right to pursue an injunction to stop infringers of the patent...
Docket No.
24-1280
Case
Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Apple Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“This Court long has recognized that a patent is the private property of its owner, who has the constitutional right to pursue an injunction to stop infringers of the patent...
Docket No.
24-1216
Case
In re Micron Technology, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“When parties enter into the civil-discovery process with an agreed-upon, court-endorsed set of guardrails in a protective order, they reasonably expect those rules to be followed and enforced. That did...
Docket No.
24-1181
Case
McLeay v. Stewart
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“This Court has made clear ‘in both civil and criminal cases, in the first instance and on appeal,’ it relies on the ‘parties to frame the issues for decision and...
Docket No.
24-1132
Case
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“In Graham v. John Deere Co., this Court established four factors for evaluating whether a patent is obvious, and therefore invalid, under 35 U.S.C. § 103. 383 U.S. 1 (1966)....
Docket No.
24-1121
Case
Carlborg v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether petitioner was deprived of the property interest right in his military retirement under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment when the court of appeals, without comment...
Docket No.
24-320
Case
Soto v. United States
Subject
Veterans4 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“This case determines whether thousands of medically retired combat veterans should receive all the combat related special compensation (CRSC) that Congress specifically authorized for combat veterans. The government has elected...
Docket No.
23-868
Case
Flynn v. Department of State
Subject
MSPB2 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...
Docket No.
23-866
Case
Nordby v. Social Security Administration
Subject
MSPB
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...
Docket No.
23-861
Case
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation
Subject
MSPB10 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“This case presents a question of critical importance to hundreds of thousands of Americans who serve their country both as federal civilian employees and members of the Armed Services’ reserve...
Docket No.
23-713
Case
Bufkin v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans9 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“For more than a century, veterans have been entitled to the benefit of the doubt on any close issue relating to their eligibility for service-related benefits. As presently codified, ‘[w]hen...
Docket No.
23-21
Case
Harrow v. Department of Defense
Subject
MSPB5 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“When a federal employee petitions the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) provides:...
Docket No.
22-888
Case
Rudisill v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans16 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods of qualifying service under the Montgomery GI Bill, 38 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and under the Post-9/11 GI...
Docket No.
22-704
Case
Vidal v. Elster
Subject
Trademark8 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Section 1052(c) of Title 15 provides in pertinent part that a trademark shall be refused registration if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name . . . identifying a particular...
Docket No.
21-757
Case
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi
Subject
Patent38 AmiciCVSG
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Section 112 of the Patent Act provides that a patent’s ‘specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it,’...
Docket No.
21-432
Case
Arellano v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans7 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Under 38 U.S.C. § 5110(b)(1), ‘[t]he effective date of an award of disability compensation to a veteran shall be the day following the date of the veteran’s discharge or release...
Docket No.
21-350
Case
Infineum USA L.P. v. Chevron Oronite Company LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether this Court should vacate the judgment below in view of its recent decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 141 S. Ct. 1970 (2021), and remand so that the...
Docket No.
21-234
Case
George v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans9 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“When the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denies a veteran’s claim for benefits in reliance on an agency interpretation that is later deemed invalid under the plain text of the...
Docket No.
20-853
Case
Iancu v. Fall Line Patents, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who must...