Petitions - Fed Circuit Blog

| Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Search By

Status

Subject

520 Petitions

Docket No.

Case

Subject

Status

Question(s) Presented

Brumfield v. IBG LLC

Question(s) Presented

“1. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) empowers parties to seek relief from an adverse judgment, upon a showing of ‘fraud,’ ‘misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.’ Petitioner filed...

DISH Network L.L.C. v. Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC

Question(s) Presented

“The Patent Act’s fee-shifting statute, 35 U.S.C. § 285, states: ‘The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.’” “The questions presented are:” 1. “Whether the Patent...

Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“The questions presented by the decision below are:” 1. “Whether the Federal Circuit applied an incorrect standard of review for appeals of a Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL) and,...

Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corp.

Question(s) Presented

“The Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s Order, overlooking the significant fact that the presiding judge was disqualified due to a conflict of interest—revealed by his late admission of common...

Kimble-Davis v. Office of Personnel Management

Question(s) Presented

“The Questions Presented are:” 1. “Whether an agency/court can determine an individual is not a designated beneficiary without providing the claimed beneficiary with the appropriate documentation?” 2. “Whether [the Office of Personnel...

Saha Thai Steel Pipe PCL v. Wheatland Tube Co.

Question(s) Presented

“Under 19 U.S.C. [§] 1673, Congress directed two agencies, the Department of Commerce (‘Commerce’) and the International Trade Commission (the ‘Commission’ or ‘ITC’), to make two distinct determinations before imposing...

Celanese International Corp. v. International Trade Commission

Question(s) Presented

“Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011 (‘AIA’), ‘[a] person shall be entitled to a patent unless * * * the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed...

Bowden v. Office of Personnel Management

Question(s) Presented

1. “Was [the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit] opinion to confirm the Merit System Protection Board (MSPB) decision in the Bowden v. [Office of Personnel Management] case...

Doyle v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Question(s) Presented

Taylor v. McDonough

Question(s) Presented

1. “If the allegations occurred of obstruction of justice, fraud on the court, and evidence tampering, which led to prejudicial losses with harmful error, can the CAVC and CAFC ignore...

Frederick v. McDonough

Question(s) Presented

1. “The SHA medical exam is required at discharge by the [Department of Defense and the Department of] Veterans Affairs. When a serviceman is overlooked, would this be a Grave...

Lighting Defense Group v. SnapRays

Question(s) Presented

“In Calder v. Jones, this Court held that California courts could exercise personal jurisdiction over Florida defendants ‘because of their intentional conduct in Florida calculated to cause injury to [plaintiff]...

ParkerVision, Inc. v. TCL Industries Holdings Co.

Question(s) Presented

“Section 144 of the Patent Act directs the Federal Circuit to decide appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) by issuing ‘opinion[s].’ 35 U.S.C. § 144. The word...

Island Intellectual Property LLC v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“This case represents a dangerous trend in patent cases whereby district courts grant summary judgment while ignoring factual disputes and/or weighing evidentiary disputes against non-movants, thus depriving parties of their...

Frantzis v. McDonough

Veterans2 Amici

Question(s) Presented

“‘The fundamental requirement of due process is the opportunity to be heard “at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.”’ Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976). Therefore,...

Flynn v. Department of State

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...

Nordby v. Social Security Administration

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...

Soto v. United States

Question(s) Presented

“This case determines whether thousands of medically retired combat veterans should receive all the combat related special compensation (CRSC) that Congress specifically authorized for combat veterans. The government has elected...

Feliciano v. Department of Transportation

Question(s) Presented

“This case presents a question of critical importance to hundreds of thousands of Americans who serve their country both as federal civilian employees and members of the Armed Services’ reserve...

Bufkin v. McDonough

Veterans9 Amici

Question(s) Presented

“For more than a century, veterans have been entitled to the benefit of the doubt on any close issue relating to their eligibility for service-related benefits. As presently codified, ‘[w]hen...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8