1. “Whether copyright protection extends to a software interface.”
2. “Whether, as the jury found, petitioner’s use of a software interface in the context of creating a new computer program constitutes fair use.”
“Given the rapidly changing technological, economic, and business-related circumstances, we believe we should not answer more than is necessary to resolve the parties’ dispute. We shall assume, but purely for argument’s sake, that the entire Sun Java API falls within the definition of that which can be copyrighted. We shall ask instead whether Google’s use of part of that API was a ‘fair use.’ Unlike the Federal Circuit, we conclude that it was.”