STIIIZY Inc. v. International Trade Commission

 
APPEAL NO.
26-1554, 26-1851
OP. BELOW
ITC
OPINION
TBD
SUBJECT
Patent
AUTHOR
TBD

Issue(s) Presented

1. “Whether investments made before a patent issues can satisfy the economic prong of the domestic-industry requirement under 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(3), when the statute requires that qualifying investments be made with respect to the articles ‘protected’ by the patent and, before issuance, no patent exists and no articles are protected by it.”

2. “Whether PAX’s asserted pre-issuance investments can satisfy the economic prong of the domestic-industry requirement under 19 U.S.C. § 1337, when PAX was not a licensee of the patents until after they issued.”

Posts About this Case