1. “Whether the Board applied an incorrect claim construction to the product-by-process claims, where the Board implicitly construed the claims as requiring several additional process steps not recited in the claims.”
2. “Whether the Board incorrectly determined that the prior art does not inherently anticipate or render obvious the product-by-process claims where the Board found that the prior art teaches the only two steps recited in the claim as the process for producing the product.”
