1. “Whether the district court lacks Article III jurisdiction to enforce its Hearing Order investigating Petitioner’s compliance with standing orders when the cases have been dismissed and there is no...
1. “Whether the district court lacks Article III jurisdiction to enforce its Hearing Order investigating Petitioner’s compliance with standing orders when the cases have been dismissed and there is no...
1. “Lobbying Costs. Absent narrow exceptions, Federal contractors are not allowed to charge the Government for lobbying activities. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 31.205-22 (reproduced at Addendum C). Raytheon includes a...
“Petitioner respectfully requests that the Court issue a writ of mandamus reversing the Memorandum Order, and directing the district court to terminate its judicial inquisition of the Petitioner.”
1. “Whether Uniloc, the undisputed owner of the patent-in-suit at the time the complaint was filed, had standing under Article III of the Constitution to sue for infringement of the...
Appeal:
1. “Does the issuance of a NITU by the STB trigger a per se categorical physical taking under the Trails Act, rendering any ‘causation’ standard inappropriate?”
2. “Does the duration of...
Appeal:
“Whether the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) erred in holding that it could certify a class that includes veterans over whom it lacks jurisdiction.”
Cross-Appeal:
1. “Whether...
1. “Whether the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records may exercise its powers under [10 U.S.C.] § 1552 to grant Mr. LaBonte disability retirement and amend his DD-214...
“The issue presented in this case is whether an AI-Generated Invention is patentable. The USPTO claims that it is not, filing a summary judgment motion to that effect, which was...
1. “Did the district court err in finding that Thales did not demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of its counterclaim requesting that the district court declare...
1. “Whether the infringement judgment and/or damages award should be reversed or vacated because Centripetal did not prove—and the district court did not find—that Cisco made, used, offered for sale,...
1. “Was the Secretary’s denial of MVA’s petition contrary to law, where it was premised on an interpretation of the Agent Orange Act that is contrary to the statute’s text,...
1. “Whether the Court of Federal Claims erred by concluding that all downstream property owners whose properties were flooded by the Government as a result of an intentional government action...
“Congress directed the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to reimburse certain out-of-pocket expenses that veterans participating in VA’s healthcare system incur obtaining emergency treatment at non-VA healthcare facilities for non-service-connected...
“Whether the trial court abused its discretion in finding that the position of the United States was not substantially justified, where the Government’s overall position with regard to the claim...
“This petition presents the issue of whether a place of business of an independently owned automotive dealership, to whom an auto manufacturer or U.S. distributor sells vehicles that are in...
“Petitioner Hyundai Motor America (“HMA”) respectfully seeks a writ of mandamus directing the district court to vacate its order denying HMA’s motion to dismiss this action and to dismiss the...
“The sole issue in this appeal is whether section 2(c) of the Lanham Act—which prohibits federal registration of any trademark that ‘[c]onsists of or comprises a name . . ....
1. “When the United States changes the capital structure of a company that it controls, transferring the value of stock held by Private Shareholders to the class of stock held...
1. “When the United States changes the capital structure of a company that it controls, transferring the value of stock held by Private Shareholders to the class of stock held...
