Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Other Cases to Watch

Search By
Status
Subject
167 Cases
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Issue(s) Presented
Appeal No.
23-1891
Case
HMTX v. United States
Subject
Trade4 Amici
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the List 3 and 4A tariff actions exceeded Defendants’ authority under Section 307 of the Trade Act.” 2. “Whether USTR’s post hoc and conclusory submission on remand cured its...
Appeal No.
23-1877
Case
Marmen Inc. v. United States
Subject
Trade4 Amici
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Was Commerce’s decision to modify Marmen’s reported product-specific raw material costs arbitrary and unsupported by substantial evidence, given that Commerce failed to apply its longstanding practice and relied on...
Appeal No.
23-1602
Case
United Water Conservation District v. United States
Subject
TakingsAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the United States effected a physical taking of a California water district’s property right to beneficial use of Santa Clara River water when the government appropriated the Santa...
Appeal No.
23-1901
Case
Farrington v. Department of Transportation
Subject
MSPBAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Did the Board err in applying the legislatively overruled Huffman holding denying full 5 U.S.C. Section 1221(e) contributing factor/clear and convincing evidence regime protections to disclosures made pursuant to...
Appeal No.
23-1909
Case
Hawaiian Dredging Construction Company, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Gov. ContractAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Claims Court erred in dismissing the Complaint which contained well plead facts sufficient to support HDCC’s claims?” 2. “Whether the Claims Court erred in dismissing portion of HDCC’s...
Appeal No.
24-2069
Case
United States v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the district court erred by not granting a judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) of no anticipation (under 35 U.S.C. § 102) when the alleged public use...
Appeal No.
23-2140
Case
Curtin v. United Trademark Holdings, Inc.
Subject
Trademark2 Amici
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the Board erred in dismissing Curtin’s opposition by misinterpreting the Lanham Act, misconstruing governing precedent, and disregarding this Court’s case law.”
Appeal No.
23-1663
Case
Stupp Corp. v. United States
Subject
TradeAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether it is reasonable for Commerce to use a statistical test in a manner inconsistent with the limitations on the methodology described by the methodology’s creator and relevant academic...
Appeal No.
23-2158, 23-2159
Case
VLSI Technology LLC v. OpenSky Industries
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Director’s sanctions rulings, including refusal to terminate the IPR, were arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or otherwise inconsistent with reasoned decisionmaking.” 2. “Whether Intel was improperly joined because...
Appeal No.
23-2346
Case
Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
Subject
Patent4 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Board erred in finding that for the limitation ‘an LED circuit array comprising an LED circuit comprising a plurality of LEDs connected in series’ is properly construed...
Appeal No.
24-1936
Case
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the statutory requirement to list in the Orange Book any patent that ‘claims the drug for which the applicant submitted [an NDA] and is a drug product (formulation...
Appeal No.
22-1994
Case
City of Fresno v. United States
Subject
Takings2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Article 3(n) of the Friant Contracts prohibits the United States from delivering San Joaquin River water to the Exchange Contractors unless and until ‘required’ to do so by the...
Appeal No.
24-1104
Case
Metropolitan Area EMS Authority v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Subject
VeteransAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) currently pays the ‘actual cost’ of ground and air ambulance transports for eligible veterans and beneficiaries pursuant to its regulation at 38 C.F.R....
Appeal No.
24-1515
Case
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the district court’s order denying an antisuit injunction should be reversed because the court erred as a matter of law in finding, as a threshold matter, that resolving...
Appeal No.
22-2160
Case
Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc.
Subject
Lanham ActAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the district court—which found that ‘Crocs admits that its advertisements have “linked” such terms as “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive” to features, characteristics, and qualities of the product material, and...
Appeal No.
23-1190
Case
ACLR, LLC v. United States
Subject
Gov. ContractAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “The CFC improperly denied ACLR’s Motion for Summary Judgment on its breach of contract claim as to ACLR’s plan year 2007 duplicate payment audit.” 2. “The CFC’s application of a...
Appeal No.
23-1387
Case
Freund v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “The Veterans Court dismissed the Petition as moot after concluding that Petitioners’ individual claims were mooted and denying class certification. Did the Veterans Court err in dismissing the Petition?” 2....
Appeal No.
22-1827
Case
Celanese International Corp. v. International Trade Commission
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the ALJ legally erred in concluding that Celanese’s sales of products made by its secret, inventive process invalidate its patent claims on that process under the on-sale provision of...
Appeal No.
22-1929
Case
Darby Development Co. v. United States
Subject
Takings3 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Did the Court of Federal Claims err as a matter of law in dismissing Plaintiffs’ takings claim?” 2. “Did the Court of Federal Claims err as a matter of law...
Appeal No.
23-1100
Case
Bureau National Interprofessionnel Du Cognac v. Cologne & Cognac Entertainment
Subject
TrademarkAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the majority’s decision rejecting Opposers’ likelihood-of confusion claim was legally erroneous and must be reversed because:” a. “The majority applied the wrong legal standard for fame (which this Court...