Appeal:
1. “Does 28 U.S.C. § 1498 enable the Government to consent to patent infringement by AeroVironment where such consent breaches its contractual and statutory obligations to Lite, a Phase III...
1. “Whether the implicit denial doctrine is inapplicable to a claim subject to the Appeals Modernization Act (AMA) because the AMA’s notice requirements, statutory structure, and principles of due process...
“Whether the [Court of International Trade] abused its discretion in denying the parties’ joint motion to redact information submitted to the Commission under a promise of confidentiality and determined by...
1. “[T]he United States International Trade Commission (‘Commission’ or ‘ITC’) respectfully requests that this Court enter a writ of mandamus ordering the United States Court of International Trade (‘CIT’ or...
1. “Is the USPTO’s decision to deny Google’s petitions immune from judicial review where the decision—by the agency’s own admission—is not within the scope of 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) as...
1. “Did the Commission err in determining that the Defaulting Respondents did not violate Section 337 [of the Tariff Act] as the sole basis for denying Crocs’s request for a...
1. “Whether the district court erred by declining to dismiss Micron’s [bad faith assertion] claims against Katana and Longhorn and by ordering that Katana’s patent infringement claims against Micron cannot...
1. “Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying EFF’s motion to intervene.”
2. “Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying EFF’s motion to unseal court records.”
1. “Whether the district court erred in sua sponte raising and then granting judgment as a matter of law on patent ineligibility, an issue that was not tried because this...
“Whether a defendant’s alleged performance of a single step of a claimed multi-step method in a judicial district is insufficient to establish that ‘the defendant has committed acts of infringement’...
1. “Did the USPTO violate due process by applying its ‘settled expectations’ rule post-hoc to pre-filed petitions?”
2. “Did the USPTO violate the APA by applying its ‘settled expectations’ rule post-hoc,...
“Was Commerce’s differential pricing methodology which determines whether there is a ‘significant difference’ between pricing patterns in a Test Group and a Comparison Group supported by substantial evidence in the...
1. Whether “[t]he Patent Office violated the 5th Amendment’s Due Process Clause by retroactively revoking its ‘binding agency guidance’ that had guaranteed SAP’s petitions would not be discretionarily denied based...
1. “Whether the USPTO violated the APA by:
a. rescinding its binding rule prohibiting discretionary denial of IPRs based on parallel litigation without notice-and-comment rulemaking;
b. retroactively applying the Rescission; and
c. failing...
“Some Federal retirees receive a temporary ‘annuity supplement’ in addition to their basic annuity. Section 8421(c) of Title 5 governs how OPM must treat an annuity supplement when a court...
1. “Whether the List 3 and 4A tariff actions exceeded Defendants’ authority under Section 307 of the Trade Act.”
2. “Whether USTR’s post hoc and conclusory submission on remand cured its...
1. “Whether the district court erred in applying prosecution laches to declare the ’885 and ’966 patents unenforceable, based on nothing but standard continuation practice that did not extend the...
“By enacting PROMESA, Congress created and authorized the Oversight Board to require the devaluation of COFINA bonds and the transfer to Puerto Rico of pledged Sales and Use Tax Revenues...
1. “Whether the district court erred in excluding evidence on invalidity and granting partial JMOL for plaintiffs on that issue.”
2. “Whether defendants are entitled to JMOL that claim 1 of...
“The principal issue presented is whether the district court erred in limiting the terms ‘branched alkyl’ and ‘branched C10-C20 alkyl’ through lexicography to require one carbon atom in the group...
