Other Cases to Watch

Search By
Status
Subject
54 Cases
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Issue(s) Presented
Appeal No.
18-2338
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“I. Network-1’s Appeal A. Independent Basis for Verdict: Does the evidence compel a finding of non-infringement irrespective of the challenged constructions? B. Claim Construction: 1. Did the district court properly construe ‘low level...
Appeal No.
19-1094
Subject
Veterans5 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Did the CAVC misinterpret Rule 23(a)’s commonality requirement to require that a proposed class of disabled veterans seeking class certification of claims alleging unreasonable system-wide delay always identify a...
Appeal No.
19-1133
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the asserted claims are invalid because: (1) They were anticipated by the prior art; or (2)They are not enabled and lack sufficient written description.” 2. “Whether the asserted claims...
Appeal No.
20-144
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
Whether a “third party’s facility qualif[ies] as a ‘regular and established place of business’ of Google within the Eastern District” based on “Google’s arms-length contract with a third-party service provider...
Appeal No.
20-1723
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the district court legally erred in its framework for evaluating objective indicia of non-obviousness, by (a) concluding that the claims were obvious before even analyzing the compelling objective...
Appeal No.
2019-1290 (L), 2019-1302
Subject
Tucker Act2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the insurers’ statutory claims fail because Congress did not intend for insurers to receive damages as compensation for cost-sharing payments that Congress declined to fund.” 2. “Whether the insurers’...
Appeal No.
19-1081
Subject
Little Tucker Act5 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Congress has conferred limited authority on the judiciary to charge fees for access to electronic court records. These fees may be imposed ‘as a charge for services rendered’ to ‘reimburse...
Appeal No.
19-2255, 19-2285
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Is Bio-Rad barred as a matter of law from asserting infringement under the doctrine of equivalents where it amended its claims to exclude the very terrain it now accuses,...
Appeal No.
20-1545
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Section 1.2(d) of the License Agreement at issue in this case permits Alkem to launch its generic Colcrys® product a specified time period ‘after the date of a Final...
Appeal No.
20-1407
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Section 1.2(d) of the License Agreement at issue in this case permits Mylan to launch its generic colchicine product a specified time period ‘after the date of a Final...
Appeal No.
19-1686
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“The primary issue on appeal is whether the Board erred in denying, based only on a § 101 patent eligibility challenge, Uniloc’s motion to amend the patent in this inter...
Appeal No.
19-1793
Subject
TakingsAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the CFC erred in ruling that a number of deeds for the rail corridor at issue in this case conveyed merely an easement to the railroad where no...
Appeal No.
19-1769
Subject
VeteransAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether a claimant’s general statement requesting benefits on a formal claim form that identifies specific disabilities constitutes a claim for all ‘reasonably identifiable’ diagnoses within the claimant’s records.”
Appeal No.
19-1650
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Dismissed
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Court should vacate the district court’s judgment of noninfringement by Watson and direct entry of the consent judgment necessary to effectuate the parties’ agreement to settle, because:...
Appeal No.
19-2349
Subject
Patent
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether Arthrex should be extended to ex parte examination cases.” 2. “Whether the Director’s purported ability to refuse to issue a patent if the Patent Trial and Appeal Board approves...
Appeal No.
20-1037
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the patents-in-suit are invalid for [obviousness-type double patenting], where Immunex— which owns all substantial rights in those patents, including the ability to control patent prosecution—had already obtained earlier-expiring...
Appeal No.
19-1385
Subject
Takings3 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the CFC erred in holding that a NITU—which did not authorize third-party use of the railroad’s right-of-way but merely imposed a short administrative hold in the railroad’s voluntary...
Appeal No.
19-1283
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the district court erred as a matter of law in determining that defendants who prevailed on two grounds—by obtaining (1) a final judgment based on a stipulation of...
Appeal No.
19-1149
Subject
Patent
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the district court erred by finding claims 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 22 of the ’207 patent, which claim an improved cardiac monitoring device, to be...
Appeal No.
18-1400
Subject
Patent4 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Did the Board err in its Final Written Decision in IPR2016-01156 finding that claims 1-15, 17-19 and 22-25 of the ’245 patent were not unpatentable as obvious under 35...