1. “Whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment of patent eligibility, even though the inventor conceded that his invention is the black- box mathematical operation of optimizing a...
1. “Whether the statutory requirement to list in the Orange Book any patent that ‘claims the drug for which the applicant submitted [an NDA] and is a drug product (formulation...
1. “Whether the Board applied an incorrect claim construction to the product-by-process claims, where the Board implicitly construed the claims as requiring several additional process steps not recited in the...
1.”Whether the United States Court of Federal Claims (CFC) erred when it refused to certify a question of Indiana property law to the Indiana Supreme Court.”
2. “Whether the CFC erred...
“Whether the district court—which found that ‘Crocs admits that its advertisements have “linked” such terms as “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive” to features, characteristics, and qualities of the product material, and...
1. “The CFC improperly denied ACLR’s Motion for Summary Judgment on its breach of contract claim as to ACLR’s plan year 2007 duplicate payment audit.”
2. “The CFC’s application of a...
1. “The Veterans Court dismissed the Petition as moot after concluding that Petitioners’ individual claims were mooted and denying class certification. Did the Veterans Court err in dismissing the Petition?”
2....
“Whether the ALJ legally erred in concluding that Celanese’s sales of products made by its secret, inventive process invalidate its patent claims on that process under the on-sale provision of...
1. “Did the Court of Federal Claims err as a matter of law in dismissing Plaintiffs’ takings claim?”
2. “Did the Court of Federal Claims err as a matter of law...
1. “Whether the majority’s decision rejecting Opposers’ likelihood-of confusion claim was legally erroneous and must be reversed because:”
a. “The majority applied the wrong legal standard for fame (which this Court...
1. “Did the district court err by failing to consider the combined weight and effect of evidence demonstrating Hikma’s repeated extra-label encouragement of using their generic version of Amarin’s patented...
1. “Does the issuance of an Order compelling a non-party to come from Texas to Delaware to testify at a post-dismissal hearing violate that non-party’s rights under Federal Rule of...
1. “Whether enactment of the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 (‘AMA’), 115 Pub. L. No. 55, 131 Stat. 1105 (Aug. 23, 2017) really does permit the Board...
“Section 9021(b) of Title 15 provides that the ‘Secretary [of Labor] shall provide to any covered individual unemployment benefit assistance . . . .’ Plaintiffs allege that they were ‘covered...
“Whether the Board’s decision was not in accordance with the law when it determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear Appellant’s appeal based on its conclusion that Appellant has not...
According to Salix:
“Two patents claim methods of treating IBS-D using a specific dosage of rifaximin: 550 mg administered three times a day (1,650 mg per day) for 14 days.”
1. “In...
“[O]nce a plaintiff has established a prima facie case under the Equal Pay Act, is an agency’s reliance on prior salary alone sufficient to carry its burden of establishing as...
1. “Did the Trial Court erroneously conclude the United States Army Corps of Engineers’ (the ‘Corps’’) denial of Lemon Bay’s wetland permit did not constitute a categorical taking of Lemon...
1. “Whether the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) erred in issuing a writ of mandamus that did not aid its exercise of actual or prospective...
“Whether it was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, clearly erroneous, or otherwise not in accordance with the law for:”
“Judge Davis to uncritically accept that the Special Master had the...
