1. “When the United States changes the capital structure of a company that it controls, transferring the value of stock held by Private Shareholders to the class of stock held...
“Whether the Board erred by rejecting Petitioner’s own expert’s claim construction of ‘wearable’ in the Patents’ context as ‘unobtrusive and easily hidden’ (like performer bodypacks are), and further erred by...
“Whether the Merit Systems Protection Board incorrectly determined that appellant was not entitled to a former spouse survivor annuity based on the Federal civil service of her deceased former husband.”
“Did the lower court commit clear error where it determined that a taxpayer’s signature on a tax return is a Congressional mandate to which the doctrine of waiver does not...
“Whether the district court erred in rejecting Appellant’s obviousness-type double patenting invalidity defense against the ‘788 patent by holding that the earlier-expiring ‘219 patent does not qualify as a double...
Should this Court issue a writ of mandamus requiring the district court to comply with well-established law and stay the merits proceedings in this case until it has resolved pending...
“Whether the unusual structure for instituting and funding AIA post-grant reviews violates the Due Process Clause in view of Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927), and its progeny, which...
“Whether in the instant action, the validity challenges brought by Samsung in the PTAB fall under the forum selection clause (‘FSC’) of the parties’ NDA because the validity challenges ‘relate...
“Whether the Government commits a categorical physical taking when it uses its legislative authority to require the abandonment or total destruction of lawfully acquired personal property.”
“Whether the Government commits a...
“The issue presented is whether the district court has personal jurisdiction over Petitioner, a Chinese corporation, when process was served domestically pursuant to [Federal] Rule [of Civil Procedure] 4(f)(3) and...
1. “Did the district court err in excluding evidence of comparable-license negotiations under the parol-evidence rule in a Georgia-Pacific analysis and the resulting royalty opinions?”
2. “Did the district court err...
“Did the Veterans Court err when it expanded the prohibition against judicial review of the VA Schedule of Rating Disabilities in 38 U.S.C. §7252(b) to encompass a BVA decision that...
“[W]hether the U.S. Court of International Trade erred when it held the [Rule promulgated by the Department of the Treasury in conjunction with U.S. Customs and Border Protection confirming the...
“[W]hether the part of 38 C.F.R. § 3.654(b)(2) (regulation 3.654(b)(2)), limiting the resumption of payment of disability benefits to ‘the day following release from active duty if [a] claim for...
“Whether substantial evidence supports the jury’s verdict that Teva willfully induced infringement of GSK’s patented method of treating congestive heart failure where: (a) Teva encouraged the infringing use in promotional...
“Whether Apple is entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to transfer the underlying litigation to the Northern District of California.”
“Whether the District Court clearly abused its discretion in refusing to transfer this case to the Northern District of California, where the overwhelming weight of the convenience factors under 28...
1. “Whether contractual language providing that patents ‘shall be the property of [an employing entity, here, the University of Michigan],’ without requiring any further acts from the parties, operates as...
“Whether the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) misinterpreted the plain language of 38 U.S.C. §§ 3322 and 3327 in holding that the election provisions expressly contained therein do...
