1. “Whether the district court erred in excluding evidence on invalidity and granting partial JMOL for plaintiffs on that issue.”
2. “Whether defendants are entitled to JMOL that claim 1 of...
1. “Whether the district court erred in sua sponte raising and then granting judgment as a matter of law on patent ineligibility, an issue that was not tried because this...
1. “Did the Government injure Textron (a requirement for claim accrual) (a) when Textron’s predecessor-in-interest curtailed and terminated the pension plans in December 2012; or (b) when the Government disputed...
1. “Whether the district court erred in applying prosecution laches to declare the ’885 and ’966 patents unenforceable, based on nothing but standard continuation practice that did not extend the...
“The principal issue presented is whether the district court erred in limiting the terms ‘branched alkyl’ and ‘branched C10-C20 alkyl’ through lexicography to require one carbon atom in the group...
Appellants
1. “Whether the PTAB legally erred by failing to apply an objective standard for conception, and/or impermissibly awarded priority without identifying any inventive contribution by the purported inventor.”
2. “Whether...
Appeal:
1. “Does 28 U.S.C. § 1498 enable the Government to consent to patent infringement by AeroVironment where such consent breaches its contractual and statutory obligations to Lite, a Phase III...
1. ”Whether the Commission erred in concluding that Masimo established an existing domestic industry, including by:”
a. “holding Masimo satisfied the technical prong, even though the item identified in the complaint...
1. “Whether the district court erred as a matter of law in holding, under 35 U.S.C. § 101, that claims to laboratory-made host cells genetically engineered to contain DNA from...
1. “Whether the district court erred by declining to dismiss Micron’s BFA claims against Katana and Longhorn and by ordering that Katana’s patent infringement claims against Micron cannot proceed until...
1. “Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying EFF’s motion to intervene.”
2. “Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying EFF’s motion to unseal court records.”
1. “Whether the district court erred by finding the ’993 patent, ’854 patent, and ’356 patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.”
2. “Whether the district court erred in its construction...
1. “Whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment of patent eligibility, even though the inventor conceded that his invention is the black- box mathematical operation of optimizing a...
1.”Whether the United States Court of Federal Claims (CFC) erred when it refused to certify a question of Indiana property law to the Indiana Supreme Court.”
2. “Whether the CFC erred...
“By enacting PROMESA, Congress created and authorized the Oversight Board to require the devaluation of COFINA bonds and the transfer to Puerto Rico of pledged Sales and Use Tax Revenues...
1. “Whether the List 3 and 4A tariff actions exceeded Defendants’ authority under Section 307 of the Trade Act.”
2. “Whether USTR’s post hoc and conclusory submission on remand cured its...
1. “Was Commerce’s decision to modify Marmen’s reported product-specific raw material costs arbitrary and unsupported by substantial evidence, given that Commerce failed to apply its longstanding practice and relied on...
1. “Whether the United States effected a physical taking of a California water district’s property right to beneficial use of Santa Clara River water when the government appropriated the Santa...
1. “Whether the district court erred by not granting a judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) of no anticipation (under 35 U.S.C. § 102) when the alleged public use...
“Whether the Board erred in dismissing Curtin’s opposition by misinterpreting the Lanham Act, misconstruing governing precedent, and disregarding this Court’s case law.”
