“Whether the ALJ legally erred in concluding that Celanese’s sales of products made by its secret, inventive process invalidate its patent claims on that process under the on-sale provision of...
1. “Whether the Commission erred in determining that Apple did not violate Section 337 on the basis that claims 16 and 17 of the ’499 patent are invalid for lack...
1. “Whether summary judgment on Teradata’s tying claim should be reversed because the district court erroneously (a) excluded testimony from Teradata’s expert economist; (b) refused to apply the per se...
1. “Did the district court err by failing to consider the combined weight and effect of evidence demonstrating Hikma’s repeated extra-label encouragement of using their generic version of Amarin’s patented...
“Did the International Trade Commission (‘Commission’) err when it found that claims 1, 2, 11, 15, and 21 of U.S. Patent No. 10,508,502 (‘the ‘502 patent’) are directed to an...
1. “Did the Court of Federal Claims err as a matter of law in dismissing Plaintiffs’ takings claim?”
2. “Did the Court of Federal Claims err as a matter of law...
1. “Whether the Board erred in determining that claims 7-9 and 17-19 of the ’499 patent and claims 3, 5, 6, 19, 21, and 22 of the ’731 patent, which...
1. “Whether the district court erred in excluding evidence on invalidity and granting partial JMOL for plaintiffs on that issue.”
2. “Whether defendants are entitled to JMOL that claim 1 of...
1. “Article 3(n) of the Friant Contracts prohibits the United States from delivering San Joaquin River water to the Exchange Contractors unless and until ‘required’ to do so by the...
1. “Whether the Board erred in finding that for the limitation ‘an LED circuit array comprising an LED circuit comprising a plurality of LEDs connected in series’ is properly construed...
1. “Does the issuance of an Order compelling a non-party to come from Texas to Delaware to testify at a post-dismissal hearing violate that non-party’s rights under Federal Rule of...
1. “Whether the district court erred in sua sponte raising and then granting judgment as a matter of law on patent ineligibility, an issue that was not tried because this...
“Whether the district court—which found that “Crocs admits that its advertisements have ‘linked’ such terms as ‘patented,’ ‘proprietary,’ and ‘exclusive’ to features, characteristics, and qualities of the product material, and...
1. “Did the Government injure Textron (a requirement for claim accrual) (a) when Textron’s predecessor-in-interest curtailed and terminated the pension plans in December 2012; or (b) when the Government disputed...
1. “Whether the district court erred in applying prosecution laches to declare the ’885 and ’966 patents unenforceable, based on nothing but standard continuation practice that did not extend the...
“The principal issue presented is whether the district court erred in limiting the terms ‘branched alkyl’ and ‘branched C10-C20 alkyl’ through lexicography to require one carbon atom in the group...
The CFC improperly denied ACLR’s Motion for Summary Judgment on its breach of contract claim as to ACLR’s plan year 2007 duplicate payment audit.
The CFC’s application of a constructive termination...
Appellants
1. “Whether the PTAB legally erred by failing to apply an objective standard for conception, and/or impermissibly awarded priority without identifying any inventive contribution by the purported inventor.”
2. “Whether...
Appeal:
1. “Does 28 U.S.C. § 1498 enable the Government to consent to patent infringement by AeroVironment where such consent breaches its contractual and statutory obligations to Lite, a Phase III...
