Think Products, Inc. v. ACCO Brands Corp.

 
APPEAL NO.
21-1128
OP. BELOW
DCT
SUBJECT
Patent
AUTHOR
Per Curiam

Question(s) Presented

  1. Whether “the ‘forfeiture’ rule announced in Customedia” is valid and whether “any forfeiture was possible before June 21, 2021.”
  2. Whether, “if no forfeiture of the right to challenge the Appointments Clause constitutional defect was possible prior to June 21, 2021, because no remedy existed, are prior PTAB decisions and appeals taken to, and decided by, this Court unconstitutionally rendered (and should be given no force or effect) and should therefore not be properly citable as precedent, whether for the purpose of stare decisis, res judicata or collateral estoppel, because such prior decisions were not ‘resolved in a valid court determination,’ New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 748-749 (2001)?”

Posts About this Case