1. “Whether the Court may disregard key functional limitations of the claims that implement the improvement to the claimed invention over the prior art in conducting a patent eligibility analysis.”
2. “Whether the Court may usurp the factfinder role and disregard the requirement to review the Board’s factual findings on written description for substantial evidence, and instead sua sponte raise a new argument at the appellate hearing that was not raised below and overrule the Board based on that new argument, without the Patent Owner or Board ever having an opportunity to address it; and”
3. “Whether the Court may disregard claim language that makes a distinction between things associated with a vehicle and things associated with the driver of the vehicle.”
