Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Sling TV, L.L.C.

 
APPEAL NO.
23-1035
OP. BELOW
DCT
SUBJECT
Attorney Fees
AUTHOR
Albright

Question(s) Presented

“In Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc., 572 U.S. 559 (2014), the Supreme Court held ‘that an appellate court should review all aspects of a district court’s § 285 determination for abuse of discretion.’ . . . On the same day, the Supreme Court also held in Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545 (2014), that ‘[d]istrict courts may determine whether a case is “exceptional” [under 35 U.S.C. § 285] in the case-by-case exercise of their discretion, considering the totality of the circumstances.’”

Whether the panel’s opinion “fails to apply either Highmark’s abuse of discretion standard of review or Octane Fitness’s totality-of-the-circumstances rubric.”

Posts About this Case

Date
Selected Proceedings and Orders