Qualcomm Inc. v. Intel Corp.

 
APPEAL NO.
20-1587, 20-1588, 20-1654, 20-1664, 20-1828, 20-1867, 20-2092, 20-2093
OP. BELOW
SUBJECT
Patent
AUTHOR
Per Curiam

Question(s) Presented

  1. “Must a real party in interest or privy of a petitioner in an inter partes review participate in the IPR as a precondition to intervening in an appeal from an IPR proceeding?”
  2. “When a party promptly moves to intervene as soon as it learns that its interests might no longer be protected by the existing parties and the record demonstrates that the existing parties will not be prejudiced by the timing of the motion to intervene, should intervention be denied solely because the request is filed after the 30-day deadline set forth in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15(d)? (Nos. 20-1587, -1588, -1654; 20-1664; and 20-1828, -1867 only.)”

Posts About this Case