Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

En Banc Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
460 Petitions
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
24-2256
Case
Golden v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
24-2148
Case
Li v. Apple Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether a prior art reference needs to include a written description to disclose a negative limitation, or whether silence constitutes such a disclosure.” 2. “Whether the panel may interpret a...
Appeal No.
24-2030, 24-2031, 24-2032, 24-2033, 24-2035, 24-2036, 24-2037, 24-2038
Case
Wakefield v. Blackboard, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the inclusion of Judge Pauline Newman, or any judge who has a witnessed and documented state of deteriorating mental capacity is allowable in the proper application of 28 U.S.C....
Appeal No.
24-2024
Case
Golden v. Google, LLC
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
24-1936
Case
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“This case presents a question that is fundamental to the Hatch-Waxman framework: what patents must be listed in the Orange Book?”
Appeal No.
24-1876, 24-1885
Case
Orange Electronic Co. v. Autel Intelligent Technology Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. Whether “the panel decision misapplied the standard for obviousness in dismissing substantial evidence as to the prior art teachings and secondary considerations.” 2. Whether “the panel ignored substantial evidence of...
Appeal No.
24-1801
Case
Polar Electro Oy v. Suunto Oy
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the decision to affirm § 101 ineligibility conflicts with this Court’s and the Supreme Court’s precedents holding that claims directed to improved processes, here specific technological improvements to...
Appeal No.
24-1783
Case
Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Vizio, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether a non-practicing patentee that does not make or sell any patented article, and that has not granted an ongoing practicing license, has any obligation under 35 U.S.C. §...
Appeal No.
24-1685
Case
Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a patent’s specification limits claims so as to require a particular feature when the specification (1) disparages prior art for omitting that feature, (2) describes ‘the invention’ as containing...
Appeal No.
24-1580
Case
Heidary v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
24-1545
Case
Innovaport LLC v. Target Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether a court may disregard preemption considerations when evaluating patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101?” 2. “Whether a court may make factual findings on a motion for summary judgment...
Appeal No.
24-1523, 24-1525
Case
Dynamite Marketing, Inc. v. The WowLine, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether an award of attorney’s fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 may be determined and calculated on the basis of a rejected claim for enhanced damages under 35 U.S.C....
Appeal No.
24-1520
Case
US Patent No. 7,679,637 LLC v. Google LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. Whether the panel “misapprehended aspects of the claims and overlooked the extensive computer code that is part of the specification, both of which explain ‘how’ the goal of asynchronous...
Appeal No.
24-1467
Case
Gamevice, Inc. v. Nintendo Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether, contrary to longstanding rules of judicial estoppel and law of the case, a party who obtains summary judgment that its product practices a patent limitation for purposes of...
Appeal No.
24-1433, 24-1434, 24-1437, 24-1438, 24-1439, 24-1440, 24-1442
Case
New York University v. ResMed, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Does a Rule 36 summary affirmance comport with precedent, the [Administrative Procedure Act], and Constitutional due process and property protections when the [Patent Trial and Appeal Board] ignored, and never...
Appeal No.
24-1428
Case
Huang v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
24-1401
Case
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a first-filed, first-issued, later-expiring patent can be invalidated by a later-filed, later-issued, earlier-expiring patent for obviousness-type double patenting.”
Appeal No.
24-1360, 24-1361
Case
Clantech, Inc. v. CoStar Realty Information, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. Whether “a claim element (or term) in a single patent claim has the same meaning throughout the claim.” 2. Whether “the Board [complied] with the Administrative Procedure Act in inter...
Appeal No.
24-1202
Case
Longitude Licensing Ltd. v. Google LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “[r]ehearing en banc is necessary because the panel decision conflicts with the Court’s body of § 101 precedent applying Alice and introduces uncertainty as to the role of the...
Appeal No.
24-1201
Case
EscapeX IP, LLC v. Google, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether affirmance of [28 U.S.C.] § 1927 sanctions based on ‘recklessness’ and ‘objective’ indicia, without an explicit finding of subjective bad faith, conflicts with Ninth Circuit precedent requiring a...