Petitions - Fed Circuit Blog

| Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Search By

Status

Subject

375 Petitions

Appeal No.

Case

Subject

Status

Question(s) Presented

19-1467, 19-1468

Alacritech, Inc. v. Intel Corporation

Question(s) Presented

Questions Presented by Alacritech: “[W]hether the Arthrex panel erred in severing the removal provisions necessary to sustain PTAB judges’ independent and impartiality, instead of striking down the entire statute.” Questions Presented by...

Alacritech, Inc. v. Intel Corporation

Question(s) Presented

Questions Presented by Alacritech: “[W]hether the Arthrex panel erred in severing the removal provisions necessary to sustain PTAB judges’ independent and impartiality, instead of striking down the entire statute.” Questions Presented by...

19-1444, 19-1445, 19-1466

Alacritech, Inc. v. Intel Corporation

Question(s) Presented

Questions Presented by Alacritech: “[W]hether the Arthrex panel erred in severing the removal provisions necessary to sustain PTAB judges’ independent and impartiality, instead of striking down the entire statute.” Questions Presented by...

19-1443, 19-1447, 19-1449, 19-1450

Intel Corporation v. Alacritech, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

Questions Presented by Alacritech: 1. “Whether Intel forfeited an Arthrex challenge to the portion of the PTAB’s decision concerning claims 31-33 because Intel voluntarily chose to file a petition before the...

19-1435, 19-1717

Spigen Korea Co. v. Ultraproof, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. Whether “[t]he Court failed to appreciate the inventor’s implicit admission that the ’218 patent is a suitable primary reference in his conception drawing.” 2. Whether “[t]he Court misapprehended the effect...

Gensetix, Inc. v. Baylor College of Medicine

Question(s) Presented

“Can a party who is not a patentee ‘have remedy by civil action for infringement’?”

19-1408, 19-1485, 18-2156

Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.

Question(s) Presented

The government presented the following questions: 1. “Whether the administrative patent judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board are inferior officers of the United States under the Appointments Clause, U.S....

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “[W]hether a litigant can waive a constitutional defense based on an intervening change of law that implicates important issues of public concern;” and 2. “[W]hether, consistent with KSR, patent claims...

Mass Engineered Design, Inc. v. Planar Systems, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a party seeking to establish 35 U.S.C. § 112(f) statutory equivalents is required to provide particularized testimony and linking argument of equivalents as is required to establish infringement under...

Solutran, Inc. v. Elavon, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Must section 101 analysis start with identifying the inventors’ claimed advance over the prior art?” 2. “Are patent claims that improve physical processes by definition non-abstract?” 3. “Are non-technical business-method inventions...

Kingston Technology Company v. SPEX Technologies, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether this Court must interpret and apply the words ‘under this section’ as used in the No-Appeal bar, 35 U.S.C. § 314(d), without regard to whether appeal is taken...

Hospira, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a party seeking to show that a property is inherent in a combination of prior art disclosures must affirmatively prove that the property is necessarily present in that combination,...

General Electric Co. v. Raytheon Technologies Corp.

Question(s) Presented

“[W]hether Article III’s injury-in-fact requirement, which the United States Supreme Court has held is an ‘irreducible minimum,’ can be relaxed for IPR petitioner appellants, contrary to this Court’s and Supreme...

19-1283, 19-1284

Dragon Intellectual Property v. DISH Network LLC

Question(s) Presented

1. “How does the legal standard for the determination of ‘prevailing party’ status apply in a case terminated as a result of intervening mootness?” 2. “When, if ever, can a litigant...

Cheetah Omni LLC v. AT&T Services, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Does the Supreme Court’s decision in Rodriguez v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. require this Court to abrogate its federal common law rule that, regardless of state contract law, continuation...

CG Technology Development, LLC v. FanDuel, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. Whether “the panel impermissibly engaged in appellate factfinding to read the primary obviousness reference . . . in such a way as to affirm unpatentability under a new claim...

In re Google LLC

Question(s) Presented

“[W]hether 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) ‘requires the regular, physical presence of an employee or other agent of the defendant conducting the defendant’s business at the alleged ‘place of business.'”

Google LLC v. Koninklijke Philips N.V.

Question(s) Presented

“Can a ‘general’ obvious-to-try theory predicated on the idea that a user ‘might’ benefit from a reference’s modification (which is not the theory argued below) be adopted on appeal without...

ARSUS, LLC v. John H. Firmage, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Should controlling Federal Circuit cases (Phillips, Johnson Worldwide, Renishaw supra, (and cases cited in those cases) that govern claim interpretation, be enforced, so that the Panel decision here will...

23andMe, Inc. v. Ancestry.com DNA, LLC

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether this Court has now carved out a categorical exception to claims incorporating natural correlations, even where the claims recite novel techniques, in contravention of Supreme Court and this...

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19