Whether “this Court overlooked, or did not have the benefit of at the time of its ruling, the following points of law and fact:
Apple’s venue witness, Mark Rollins, was found to be unreliable and uncredible by the District Court in another case the day prior to this Court’s ruling;
the Court disregarded the high burden a petitioner must satisfy to obtain mandamus relief;
the Court placed too heavy an emphasis on the convenience factor in contravention of its prior case law; and
the Court improperly ignored the weight entitled to the plaintiff’s choice of forum.”
