Click-to-Call Technologies, LP v. Ingenio, Inc.

 
APPEAL NO.
22-1016
OP. BELOW
DCT
SUBJECT
Patent
AUTHOR
Stoll

Question(s) Presented

“Whether 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)’s IPR estoppel provision applies only to claims addressed in the final written decision, as consistent with the holdings in Shaw, and Intuitive Surgical, and whether that interpretation remains correct after SAS Institute, Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S. Ct. 1348 (2018).”

Posts About this Case

Date
Selected Proceedings and Orders