1. Whether “a claim element (or term) in a single patent claim has the same meaning throughout the claim.”
2. Whether “the Board [complied] with the Administrative Procedure Act in inter partes reviews, by timely informing the patent owner of the matters of fact and law asserted.”
3. Whether “the Board evaluate[d] evidence of inventor corroboration under the rule of reason, and not extend the requirement of corroboration beyond reasonable bounds.”
